Elastic Observability vs Nagios Core comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Elastic Logo
5,365 views|4,419 comparisons
90% willing to recommend
Nagios Logo
7,219 views|5,159 comparisons
78% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Elastic Observability and Nagios Core based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Elastic Observability vs. Nagios Core Report (Updated: May 2024).
771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It has always been a stable solution.""The architecture and system's stability are simple.""The most valuable feature of Elastic Observability is the text search.""The price is very less expensive compared to the other solutions.""The solution is open-source and helps with back-end logging. It is also easy to handle.""For full stack observability, Elastic is the best tool compared with any other tool .""Elastic APM has plenty of features, such as the Elastic server for Kibana and many additional plugins. It's a comprehensive tool when used as a logging platform.""The solution has been stable in our usage."

More Elastic Observability Pros →

"I like that it's very simple to install, easy to manage and deploy, and easy to use for monitoring.""The most valuable feature of Nagios Core is the ability to check the availability of the server for network connectivity. Additionally, the interface is good.""I like the way the solution sends alerts and how it keeps on escalating them.""Dashboard provides monitor of total assets.""We use the product to monitor server applications.""The most valuable feature depends on the project. It's great if you need to check to ensure a service is running 24/7. I can use the full solution for free, and it's flexible. If I need to add a dashboard, I can integrate it with Nagios. Cloud synchronization is wonderful.""Nagios Core is very configurable. Whatever you want, you can do it.""Other products are good but from the configuration point of view Nagios is really very lightweight. The price is really good in my opinion. Another important thing is that my Nagios engine still works with Dual core 8GB ram for the last 10 years."

More Nagios Core Pros →

Cons
"If we had some pre-defined templates for observability that we could start using right away after deploying it – instead of having to build or to change some of the dashboards – that would be helpful.""The cost must be made more transparent.""The solution needs to use more AI. Once the product onboards AI, users would more effectively be able to track endpoints for specific messages.""There could be more low-code features included in the product.""The interface could be improved.""Elastic Observability needs to improve the retrieval of logs and metrics from all the instances.""Elastic Observability needs to have better standardization, logging, and schema.""Elastic Observability’s price could be improved."

More Elastic Observability Cons →

"Nagios Core can improve the graphical interface, it would make things a little easier.""It's not that easy to install the product itself. Also, the UI is a bit hard for regular users to navigate through.""I would like to see a sensor that shows the traffic of a user and what they're doing on the network.""The mapping is a little hard.""Nagios Core could improve by adding a user interface. If you want the user interface you have to use Nagios XI.""Nagios Core is limited in terms of distributed setups, and there is no central view for remote data centers.""I believe Nagios Core will need to provide an option for big data platforms in the future.""It would be nice if the company offered a sales or contract manager that was dedicated to our company so that we would have some sort of link to Nagios, and if we had issues or questions, we'd be able to contact them directly."

More Nagios Core Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "So far, there are just the standard licensing fees. Several of the components are embedded in the license or are even open source. They're even free depending on what you use, which makes it even more appealing to someone that is discussing pricing of the solution."
  • "There are two types: cloud and SaaS. They charge based on data ingestion, ingest rate, hard retention, and warm retention. I believe it costs around $25,000 annually to ingest 30GB of data daily. That is the SaaS version. There is also a self-managed license where the customer manages their own infrastructure on-prem. In such cases, there are three license tiers that respectively cost $5,000 annually per node, $7,000 per node, and $12,500 per node."
  • "Pricing is one of those situations where the more you use it, the more you pay."
  • "The price of Elastic Observability is expensive."
  • "Users have to pay for some features, like the alerts on different channels, because they are unavailable in different source versions."
  • "One needs to pay for the licenses, and it is an annual subscription model right now."
  • "Since we are a huge company, Elastic Observability is an affordable solution for us."
  • "We will buy a premium license after POC."
  • More Elastic Observability Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It's free."
  • "The Nagios Core (PNP4Nagios + Core) is free and can be setup by Netadmin within a few hours. The only additional cost is the cloud server."
  • "We have saved a lot of time, money, and effort in reducing disaster times, which is owed to Nagios quick alerting."
  • "Nagios Core is free to use."
  • "Lessening the price point would be an improvement."
  • "We are using the open-source, unpaid version."
  • "Most the plugin features are free."
  • "We are using the free version."
  • More Nagios Core Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
    771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Elastic Observability significantly improves incident response time by providing quick access to logs and data across various sources. For instance, searching for specific keywords in logs spanning… more »
    Top Answer:I rate the pricing a five out of ten. The product is not that cheap.
    Top Answer:The tool's scalability involves a more complex implementation process. It requires careful calculations to determine the number of nodes needed, the specifications of each node, and the configuration… more »
    Top Answer:What I like about Nagios Core is that it helps me ensure everything is running smoothly by checking the status of hosts and services.
    Top Answer:I have found Nagios Core to be challenging in terms of its centralized architecture and configuration complexities, especially in a Microsoft environment. Making optimizations or changes often… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    5,365
    Comparisons
    4,419
    Reviews
    16
    Average Words per Review
    445
    Rating
    7.9
    Views
    7,219
    Comparisons
    5,159
    Reviews
    13
    Average Words per Review
    380
    Rating
    8.2
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview
    To effectively monitor and gain insights across your distributed systems, you need to have all your observability data in one stack. Break down silos by bringing together application, infrastructure, and user data into a unified solution for end-to-end observability and alerting.
    Rely on the most widely deployed observability platform available, built on the proven Elastic Stack (also known as the ELK Stack) to converge silos, delivering unified visibility and actionable insights.

    This is IT infrastructure monitoring's industry-standard, open-source core. Free without professional support services.

    Sample Customers
    PSCU, Entel, VITAS, Mimecast, Barrett Steel, Butterfield Bank
    Airbnb, Cisco, PayPal, FanDuel
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company27%
    Manufacturing Company18%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    Healthcare Company9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Healthcare Company6%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company25%
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Retailer13%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Government11%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Educational Organization8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise55%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise67%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business38%
    Midsize Enterprise21%
    Large Enterprise42%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise58%
    Buyer's Guide
    Elastic Observability vs. Nagios Core
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Elastic Observability vs. Nagios Core and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Elastic Observability is ranked 10th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 22 reviews while Nagios Core is ranked 7th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 46 reviews. Elastic Observability is rated 7.8, while Nagios Core is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Elastic Observability writes "The user interface framework lets us do custom development when needed. ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nagios Core writes "An Open Source Fully Featured Data Centre Monitoring Tool". Elastic Observability is most compared with Dynatrace, New Relic, AppDynamics, Azure Monitor and Sentry, whereas Nagios Core is most compared with Zabbix, Nagios XI, Icinga, Centreon and OP5 Monitor. See our Elastic Observability vs. Nagios Core report.

    See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

    We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.