We performed a comparison between Forescout Platform and Trend Vision One Endpoint Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Compliance solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The initial setup is easy, taking no more than two or three weeks."
"It has helped with improving our security posture in terms of controlling the access of rogue devices into our network through identification. We have been able to prevent rogue device activities on the network, check the health of the system, and ensure remediation."
"Forescout CounterACT has allowed us to better open our access and control wireless access globally from our HQ. This allows us to monitor the network access for every office globally. This has improved overall security, reducing risk and opening up the opportunity to provide greater end user flexibility."
"Within three or four days, we have complete visibility of your infrastructure on the network. Compared to other solutions, the deployment of the solution is easier and we can close the project quickly."
"The most valuable features of the Forescout Platform are NAC for sharing, Network Access Control, and port sharing of the devices."
"Its feature that I have found most valuable is that it is very granular. You can configure granular controls just as you want those policies to be implemented. It gives you that flexibility to go granular in how you want your controls to be implemented. That's something I like about it."
"The interface is easy to use."
"The user interface is quite simple."
"We have found the reports to be most valuable."
"It's reduced administrative overhead overall thanks to its centralized dashboard and single network administrator."
"Vulnerability management is a valuable feature that I enjoy."
"The solution can scale."
"The features that I have found most valuable are the endpoint security with the zero-day vulnerability. They have an on-premise sandboxing solution which prevents any of those zero-day vulnerability issues."
"Apex One offers a lot of bang for your buck. It includes an antivirus solution, DLP, app control, and all the other features found in endpoint protection solutions like Microsoft Defender. Many other solutions require additional licenses for different operating systems, but Trend Micro software bundles everything."
"It provides comprehensive visibility into all client logs and seamlessly integrates with other products, such as CM."
"Stability-wise, it is a good product, and I rate it a ten out of ten."
"Regarding pricing, there is room for improvement to enhance competitiveness with other vendors and solutions."
"Multitenancy should be included in the next version so it could be used as a managed service provider."
"The initial setup was complex."
"When we automate an email to send to a user, sometimes it gets blocked, but that has nothing to do with Forescout. It depends on the mail gateway that we use or integrate with."
"Logging would be one area for improvement. When we're troubleshooting, there are not a lot of clear things on Google that we can look up for ourselves. When we have an issue with it, we have to call the company to get the vendors involved. The logging of Forescout is horrible compared to other things that we've used."
"The biggest disadvantage is the pricing."
"The initial setup is a bit complex."
"More detailed analysis during the authentication process, especially for troubleshooting access issues. We have found that troubleshooting RADIUS controls is quite arduous, as it is today. A trace function could easily resolve this by providing a means by which access issues from a certificate to passwords or accounts could easily be identified and remediated."
"I'd like to see the different interface components combined into one, or be allowed to get to the agent management portion without having to log into the main console."
"The CPU usage when scanning is too high and we have run into bottlenecks were it consumes a lot of CPU time."
"Some of the updates still require a complete reboot of the system."
"Whether the license is monthly or annual depends on the deal of the company."
"The reporting can be improved. We'd like to have had broader insights as to what was happening on a machine."
"The solution could be more proactive by using AI to assess the production landscape and compete with other products."
"Trend Micro Apex One could include more in-depth endpoint protection."
"Trend Micro Apex One could improve by having better integration in the future."
More Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Forescout Platform is ranked 4th in Endpoint Compliance with 69 reviews while Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is ranked 3rd in Endpoint Compliance with 125 reviews. Forescout Platform is rated 8.4, while Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Forescout Platform writes "We can go granular on each endpoint, quarantine non-compliant machines, and target vulnerabilities through scripting". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Vision One Endpoint Security writes "We can get consolidated logs of suspicious objects and malware attacks in a single console". Forescout Platform is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Aruba ClearPass, Fortinet FortiNAC, Nozomi Networks and Armis, whereas Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is most compared with Trend Micro Deep Security, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Trend Vision One, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and CrowdStrike Falcon. See our Forescout Platform vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security report.
See our list of best Endpoint Compliance vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Compliance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
