We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiClient and Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is a scalable solution...The initial setup of Fortinet FortiEDR was straightforward."
"The solution was relatively easy to deploy."
"The console is easy to read. I also like the scanning part and the ability to move assets from one to the other."
"I get alerts when scripts are detected in the environment."
"The stability is very good."
"It is stable and scalable."
"Fortinet is very user-friendly for customers."
"Forensics is a valuable feature of Fortinet FortiEDR."
"Installation was easy."
"The configuration is the most valuable feature."
"It’s really easy to use."
"Fortinet FortiClient is not disruptive, and its interface is great. It has an in-built VPN, which is very useful."
"From Forticlient, the EMS, the central management is easy to use."
"The product's initial setup phase is easy."
"The VPN has proven to be quite useful."
"Fortinet FortiClient can be used with FortiManager to observe all actions that are happening."
"Technical support is excellent."
"Trellix Endpoint Security has a full suite of DLP."
"The features we have found most valuable have been containment as well as the ability to triage agent activities."
"FireEye Endpoint Security's scalability is awesome. I think it is one of the best on that front."
"The most valuable feature is the integration between environments."
"Provides protection against threats."
"The most valuable network security feature is the network sandbox solution. This sandbox feature works on traffic flow."
"The agents are easy to deploy."
"We've had a lot of false positives; things incorrectly flagged that require manual configuration to allow. Even worse, after we allow a legitimate program, it sometimes gets flagged again after an update. This has caused a lot of extra work for my team."
"The amount of usage, the number of details we get, or the number of options that can be tweaked is limited in comparison to that with other EDR solutions"
"There's room for improvement in the quick response time and technical support for integration issues, especially when dealing with multiple vendors."
"They can include the automation for the realtime updates. We have a network infrastructure with remote sites. Whenever they send updates, they are not automated. We have to go into the console and push those updates. I wish it was more automated. The update file is currently around 31 MB. It could be smaller."
"Once, we had an event that was locked and blocked, but information about it came to us two or three days later."
"The dashboard isn't easy to access and manage."
"Making the portal mobile friendly would be helpful when I am out of office."
"The SIEM could be improved."
"The quality and response time of the support team must be improved."
"The pricing could use improvement."
"I have yet to find the benefits of the latest upgraded version."
"The solution's access control could be improved."
"The tool is expensive."
"Technical support needs to determine priority level based on the cases rather than the support package bundle."
"We'd like to be able to properly encrypt the data more effectively."
"The solution has some issues with stability on the user side."
"The product could be flexible and offer better pricing."
"I hope the solution can be used in cloud systems going forward."
"There should be better integration between the ePolicy Orchestrator and FireEye console. The integration of both consoles should be better."
"The product is consolidating its portfolio into one product. It is difficult at the moment."
"The product’s on-premise version is costly in terms of extra charges for SQL database and Windows server licenses."
"The complexity of advanced modules can be improved."
"I would like to see more local integration for the applications that we use."
"The price of McAfee MVISION Endpoint could improve."
More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Fortinet FortiClient is ranked 15th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 86 reviews while Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is ranked 19th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 49 reviews. Fortinet FortiClient is rated 8.0, while Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiClient writes "Easy to set up and user-friendly with good support ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) writes "Reliable with good independent modules and a straightforward setup". Fortinet FortiClient is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business, Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway and Ivanti Connect Secure, whereas Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is most compared with Trellix Endpoint Security, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) and Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks. See our Fortinet FortiClient vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.