We performed a comparison between Galvanize HighBond and RSA Archer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two GRC solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is automation."
"With RSA Archer, an admin can set permissions for a normal user to go directly to the tool they need to input some data. Admins can then go through that and approve some requests. Also, they can log in based on these kinds of permissions, including ticketing, service patches, or upgrades."
"Good dashboards and reporting features; it's easy to gather reports quickly."
"The most valuable features of RSA Archer are the asset management, risk management, and vendor management."
"The part I liked about Archer was the risk assessment for deficiencies and being able to use it there."
"Enables development of any application, automation of any workflow including the GRC work processes."
"It has the best workload management features."
"First of all, its access control feature where it provides application level access, solution level access, and even recall access, as well."
"RSA is a very rich application. I like its adaptive suggestion, where based on your users and the class of data, it can actually recommend you the proper control to choose. For example, we have been using PCI DSS as an NIST. So based on application feedback, it will provide you with a suggestion on which control objective needs to be set. Based on that, you can make a decision—you don't need to take the suggestion, but you can customize that particular provided suggestion. RSA Archer's workflow is also good, in terms of process automation."
"The cost of the solution is expensive and needs improvement."
"There were so many problems that we had found. One time, the search index was not working. We also faced slowness in Archer, but I resolved this issue."
"GUI could be improved."
"The bullet chart is the best graph for my purposes, and it should be available for inclusion in the dashboards."
"Some areas are not truly automated but are only scheduled."
"It would be useful for customers if COBIT 2019 could be translated into different languages."
"RSA Archer's best features are advanced workflow, reports, dashboards, and notifications."
"The first improvement I would suggest for RSA Archer is a better search feature. The search criteria needs to be improved. Sometimes I do a search and the search doesn't return the exact item I'm looking for. RSA Archer could also be improved by being more user-friendly. Maybe I have been using a limited version of RSA Archer, but I'm not sure whether it has ESG, environmental and social governance. In the next couple of years, ESG is the next feature that will be integrated into GRC tools. I would recommend RSA Archer adds ESG."
"The product is expensive."
Galvanize HighBond is ranked 9th in GRC with 3 reviews while RSA Archer is ranked 1st in GRC with 38 reviews. Galvanize HighBond is rated 8.6, while RSA Archer is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Galvanize HighBond writes "Good automation and analytics, but is costly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RSA Archer writes "A rich application with good workflow, but search feature needs improvement". Galvanize HighBond is most compared with ACL Analytics and Workiva Wdesk, whereas RSA Archer is most compared with OneTrust GRC, IBM OpenPages, MetricStream, Microsoft Purview Communication Compliance and Workiva Wdesk. See our Galvanize HighBond vs. RSA Archer report.
See our list of best GRC vendors, best IT Governance vendors, and best IT Vendor Risk Management vendors.
We monitor all GRC reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.