Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
GitHub Logo
2,341 views|966 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
GitLab Logo
4,546 views|3,575 comparisons
98% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary
Updated on Mar 9, 2023

We performed a comparison between GitHub and GitLab based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.

  • Ease of Deployment: GitHub’s deployment can be challenging for private repositories and secure shell codes. GitLab’s deployment is straightforward with an emphasis on education.
  • Features: GitLab is a powerful toolset with a comprehensive CI/CD engine, making it the number one tool from that perspective. It's a unified platform that can handle source code management, build, deployment, and artifact management, and has an established roadmap for future enhancements. GitHub's valuable features include version control, parallel development, and forking, and it enables disparate repositories and projects in a single solution that provides good time reduction and security.
  • Pricing: GitHub's pricing is based on user count and license management can be difficult. GitLab has one free and two paid editions with clear pricing.
  • Service and support: GitHub has great tech support. GitLab's customer service may vary for long-time customers.
  • ROI: GitHub has a positive return on investment since it enables improved product release control and time savings. GitLab's ROI is predicted as a result of recent adoption.

Comparison Result: Based on the reviews provided by users, GitHub and GitLab both seem to provide comprehensive and practical software development and project management tools. Long-time users find GitLab's customer service and responsiveness less reliable than GitHub's because they haven't had enough time to develop in that direction.

To learn more, read our detailed GitHub vs. GitLab Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"This product allows us to easily collaborate on development tasks with our subcontractors, and control the workflow as the project progresses.""GitHub is the best tool for source repositories.""The most valuable features of GitHub are the ease of integration into Microsoft Azure DevOps. The process that you need to deploy into Microsoft Azure becomes fairly simple and the templates are already available, a lot of the engineers find it easier to use.""The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.""GitHub provides the SFH key to protect our passwords and connection.""This solution is just easy to use.""I use this solution to store my code in a repository so we can manage version control which is useful.""The deployment is fast since we just have to run the script, and once it's done, it takes a few minutes."

More GitHub Pros →

"I have found the most valuable features of GitLab are the GitClone, GitPush, GitPull, GitMatch, GitMit, GitCommit, and GitStatus.""It speeds up our development, it's faster, safer, and more convenient.""The solution makes the CI/CD pipelines easy to execute.""The initial setup of GitLab is pretty simple, with no complications.""I like GitLab from the CI/CD perspective. It is much easier to set up CI/CD and then integrate with other tools.""This is a scalable solution. We had around 200 users working with it.""GitLab is very useful for pipelines, continuous integration, and continuous deployment. It is also stable.""For us, Gitlab's most valuable feature is the integration with Cypress. We're using Cypress as an automation tool, so we're using GitLab as a tool for running in parallel."

More GitLab Pros →

Cons
"GitHub uses basic configuration, but messaging is not clear.""From the recruiting standpoint, I would like to see email IDs and phone numbers and a brief introduction about their profile.""GitHub needs to improve its UI.""Lacks sufficient support in terms of professional services that could be provided.""I would want to see some form of code security scanning implemented.""Though I haven't done much research, GitHub lacks in providing more functions like GitLab.""It would be good if there were training materials for junior developers.""They're improving the work items to track the progress of the team, but in my experience, Azure DevOps is better in this functionality. GitHub needs to improve the form to track the progress of the work done by a team."

More GitHub Cons →

"The solution could improve by providing more integration into the CI/CD pipeline, an autocomplete search tool, and more supporting documentation.""I'm new to GitLab, so I would appreciate more documentation about the code and commands.""This solution could be improved by adding modifications such as slack notifications.""GitLab can improve the integration with third-party applications. It could be made easier. Additionally, having API control from my application could be helpful.""The only thing our company is really waiting on in terms of features is the development of metrics.""It could have more security integrations and the ability to check the vulnerability of the code. I don't think it is a responsibility of Gitlab, but it would be nice to have more options to integrate with.""I would like to see better integration with project management tools such as Jira.""The integration could be slightly better."

More GitLab Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The private repositories are free, which is very good."
  • "It is open-source. There is no license for GitHub."
  • "The price of this solution is reasonable."
  • "If there are only 10 people using a particular repository, then GitHub is free. But if we increase the number of users, we need to pay the normal charge for GitHub."
  • "We have an enterprise licensing agreement, and I am not part of the finance department so I can't say how much it costs."
  • "I haven't had to pay anything for GitHub, I use the free version."
  • "The licensing model for GitHub is user-based. Whenever the new developer joins we have to get a new license and register their ID. The overall price of the solution is reasonable."
  • "The licensing model from GitHub is very clear."
  • More GitHub Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "I think that we pay approximately $100 USD per month."
  • "The price is okay."
  • "It seems reasonable. Our IT team manages the licenses."
  • "Its price is fine. It is on the cheaper side and not expensive. You have to pay additionally for GitLab CI/CD minutes. Initially, we used the free version. When we ran out of GitLab minutes, we migrated to the paid version."
  • "It is very expensive. We can't bear it now, and we have to find another solution. We have a yearly subscription in which we can increase the number of licenses, but we have to pay at the end of the year."
  • "I don't mind the price because I use the free version."
  • "We are using its free version, and we are evaluating its Premium version. Its Ultimate version is very expensive."
  • "The price of GitLab could be better, it is expensive."
  • More GitLab Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer: The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.
    Top Answer:We pay a subscription-based yearly licensing fee for the solution. If you buy extra support, you pay an additional cost.
    Top Answer:The solution's cost is high and should be reduced. Our company has a bundle product. Sometimes, people from outside our organization also need to collaborate with our code, and we need to integrate… more »
    Top Answer:I find the features and version control history to be most valuable for our development workflow. These aspects provide us with a clear view of changes and help us manage requests efficiently.
    Top Answer:For small-scale usage, GitLab offers a free tier. For enterprise pricing, GitLab is more expensive than GitHub, as it's not as widely adopted. GitLab is the preferred choice for many developers… more »
    Top Answer:I believe there's room for improvement in the advanced features, particularly in enhancing the pipeline functionalities. Better integration and usability within the pipeline could make a significant… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    2,341
    Comparisons
    966
    Reviews
    56
    Average Words per Review
    359
    Rating
    8.6
    Views
    4,546
    Comparisons
    3,575
    Reviews
    48
    Average Words per Review
    409
    Rating
    8.6
    Comparisons
    Snyk logo
    Compared 28% of the time.
    AWS CodeCommit logo
    Compared 12% of the time.
    Fortify on Demand logo
    Compared 12% of the time.
    Bitbucket logo
    Compared 11% of the time.
    SonarQube logo
    Compared 2% of the time.
    Microsoft Azure DevOps logo
    Compared 50% of the time.
    SonarQube logo
    Compared 5% of the time.
    Bamboo logo
    Compared 5% of the time.
    AWS CodePipeline logo
    Compared 5% of the time.
    Tekton logo
    Compared 4% of the time.
    Also Known As
    Fuzzit
    Learn More
    Overview
    GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

    GitLab is a complete DevOps platform that enables teams to collaborate and deliver software faster. 

    It provides a single application for the entire DevOps lifecycle, from planning and development to testing, deployment, and monitoring. 

    With GitLab, teams can streamline their workflows, automate processes, and improve productivity.

    Sample Customers
    Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent
    1. NASA  2. IBM  3. Sony  4. Alibaba  5. CERN  6. Siemens  7. Volkswagen  8. ING  9. Ticketmaster  10. SpaceX  11. Adobe  12. Intuit  13. Autodesk  14. Rakuten  15. Unity Technologies  16. Pandora  17. Electronic Arts  18. Nordstrom  19. Verizon  20. Comcast  21. Philips  22. Deutsche Telekom  23. Orange  24. Fujitsu  25. Ericsson  26. Nokia  27. General Electric  28. Cisco  29. Accenture  30. Deloitte  31. PwC  32. KPMG
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Government9%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Government7%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Retailer10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization25%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business43%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise49%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise66%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business44%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise47%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise34%
    Large Enterprise51%
    Buyer's Guide
    GitHub vs. GitLab
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub vs. GitLab and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    GitHub is ranked 9th in Application Security Tools with 74 reviews while GitLab is ranked 6th in Application Security Tools with 70 reviews. GitHub is rated 8.6, while GitLab is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of GitHub writes "Beneficial version control and continuous integration, but guides would be helpful". On the other hand, the top reviewer of GitLab writes "Powerful, mature, and easy to set up and manage". GitHub is most compared with Snyk, AWS CodeCommit, Fortify on Demand, Bitbucket and SonarQube, whereas GitLab is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, SonarQube, Bamboo, AWS CodePipeline and Tekton. See our GitHub vs. GitLab report.

    See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.