GitLab vs HCL AppScan comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
GitLab Logo
4,611 views|3,608 comparisons
98% willing to recommend
HCLTech Logo
5,423 views|4,191 comparisons
82% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between GitLab and HCL AppScan based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Application Security Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed GitLab vs. HCL AppScan Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"I like GitLab's security and SAS tools.""The most valuable features of GitLab are the CI/CD pipeline and code management.""The tool helps to integrate CI/CD pipeline deployments. It is very easy to learn. Its security model is good.""We use the Git repository and tagging feature. We are a product-based company and use this solution to move to a forward or backward tag.""It's a great toolbox where the CI/CD pipeline is the fundamental component, but there are so many other features that you can pull from, which makes it a very powerful tool. My current client is using AWS, and they can, of course, use AWS CodePipeline, but GitLab is much more mature than that, and it also gives you the freedom to decide to go to another platform or have a multi-cloud strategy and things like that. That freedom for me is also very valuable.""The most valuable feature of GitLab is its convenience. I am able to trace back most of my changes up to a far distance in time and it helps me to analyze and see the older version of the code.""GitLab integrates well with other platforms.""The most valuable feature of GitLab is its security."

More GitLab Pros →

"There's extensive functionality with custom rules and a custom knowledge base.""The reporting part is the most valuable feature.""The security and the dashboard are the most valuable features.""It comes with all of the templates that we need. For example, we are a company that is regulated by PCI. In order to be PCI compliant, we have a lot of checks and procedures to which we have to comply.""AppScan is stable.""The most valuable feature of HCL AppScan is its integration with the SDLC, particularly during the coding phase.""I like the recording feature.""The most valuable feature of HCL AppScan is scanning QR codes."

More HCL AppScan Pros →

Cons
"This solution could be improved by adding modifications such as slack notifications.""There is room for improvement in GitLab Agents.""I would like to see better integration with project management tools such as Jira.""I rate the support from GitLab a four out of five.""Even if I say I want some improvement, they will say it is already planned in the first quarter, second quarter, or third quarter. That said, most everything is quite improved already, and they're improving even further still.""When deploying the solution on cloud and the CI/CD pipeline, we have to define the steps and it becomes confusing.""We'd always like to see better pricing on the product.""The documentation could be improved to help newcomers better understand things like creating new branches."

More GitLab Cons →

"We have experienced challenges when trying to integrate this solution with other products. When you compare it with the other SecOps products, the quality of the output is too low. It is not a new-age product. It is very outdated.""Scans become slow on large websites.""Sometimes it doesn't work so well.""We would like to see a check in the specific vulnerabilities in mobile applications or rooted devices, such as jailbreaking devices.""It's a little bit basic when you talk about the Web Services. If AppScan improved its maturity on Web Services testing, that would be good.""The solution's scalability can be a matter of concern because one license runs on one machine only.""Improving usability could enhance the overall experience with AppScan. It would be beneficial to make the solution more user-friendly, ensuring that everyone can easily navigate and utilize its features.""The solution needs to improve in some areas. The tool needs to add more languages. It also needs to improve its speed."

More HCL AppScan Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I think that we pay approximately $100 USD per month."
  • "The price is okay."
  • "It seems reasonable. Our IT team manages the licenses."
  • "Its price is fine. It is on the cheaper side and not expensive. You have to pay additionally for GitLab CI/CD minutes. Initially, we used the free version. When we ran out of GitLab minutes, we migrated to the paid version."
  • "It is very expensive. We can't bear it now, and we have to find another solution. We have a yearly subscription in which we can increase the number of licenses, but we have to pay at the end of the year."
  • "I don't mind the price because I use the free version."
  • "We are using its free version, and we are evaluating its Premium version. Its Ultimate version is very expensive."
  • "The price of GitLab could be better, it is expensive."
  • More GitLab Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "AppScan is a little bit expensive. IBM needs to work a little bit on the pricing model, decreasing the license cost."
  • "With the features, that they offer, and the support, they offer, AppScan pricing is on a higher level."
  • "Pricing was the main reason that we went ahead with this solution as they were the lowest in the market."
  • "HCL AppScan is expensive."
  • "I would rate the product's pricing a nine out of ten. The product's pricing is expensive compared to the features that they offer."
  • "The price is very expensive."
  • "The solution is moderately priced."
  • "The price of HCL AppScan is okay, in my opinion. You just buy HCL AppScan and don't pay anything anymore, meaning it is just a one-time purchase."
  • More HCL AppScan Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:I find the features and version control history to be most valuable for our development workflow. These aspects provide us with a clear view of changes and help us manage requests efficiently.
    Top Answer:For small-scale usage, GitLab offers a free tier. For enterprise pricing, GitLab is more expensive than GitHub, as it's not as widely adopted. GitLab is the preferred choice for many developers… more »
    Top Answer:I believe there's room for improvement in the advanced features, particularly in enhancing the pipeline functionalities. Better integration and usability within the pipeline could make a significant… more »
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of HCL AppScan is its integration with the SDLC, particularly during the coding phase.
    Top Answer:Improving usability could enhance the overall experience with AppScan. It would be beneficial to make the solution more user-friendly, ensuring that everyone can easily navigate and utilize its… more »
    Top Answer:I mainly use AppScan to secure various types of applications. I use its DAFDAT solution for black box scanning, as well as SaaS and source code validation. AppScan helps in scanning code for… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    4,611
    Comparisons
    3,608
    Reviews
    50
    Average Words per Review
    406
    Rating
    8.6
    Views
    5,423
    Comparisons
    4,191
    Reviews
    16
    Average Words per Review
    346
    Rating
    7.2
    Comparisons
    Microsoft Azure DevOps logo
    Compared 50% of the time.
    SonarQube logo
    Compared 5% of the time.
    Bamboo logo
    Compared 5% of the time.
    AWS CodePipeline logo
    Compared 5% of the time.
    Tekton logo
    Compared 4% of the time.
    SonarQube logo
    Compared 16% of the time.
    Veracode logo
    Compared 12% of the time.
    Acunetix logo
    Compared 11% of the time.
    OWASP Zap logo
    Compared 8% of the time.
    Also Known As
    Fuzzit
    IBM Security AppScan, Rational AppScan, AppScan
    Learn More
    Overview

    GitLab is a complete DevOps platform that enables teams to collaborate and deliver software faster. 

    It provides a single application for the entire DevOps lifecycle, from planning and development to testing, deployment, and monitoring. 

    With GitLab, teams can streamline their workflows, automate processes, and improve productivity.

    IBM Security AppScan enhances web application security and mobile application security, improves application security program management and strengthens regulatory compliance. By scanning your web and mobile applications prior to deployment, AppScan enables you to identify security vulnerabilities and generate reports and fix recommendations.

    Sample Customers
    1. NASA  2. IBM  3. Sony  4. Alibaba  5. CERN  6. Siemens  7. Volkswagen  8. ING  9. Ticketmaster  10. SpaceX  11. Adobe  12. Intuit  13. Autodesk  14. Rakuten  15. Unity Technologies  16. Pandora  17. Electronic Arts  18. Nordstrom  19. Verizon  20. Comcast  21. Philips  22. Deutsche Telekom  23. Orange  24. Fujitsu  25. Ericsson  26. Nokia  27. General Electric  28. Cisco  29. Accenture  30. Deloitte  31. PwC  32. KPMG
    Essex Technology Group Inc., Cisco, West Virginia University, APIS IT
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Retailer10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization25%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    REVIEWERS
    Government15%
    Transportation Company15%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Insurance Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Government10%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business44%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise47%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise34%
    Large Enterprise51%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise63%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise72%
    Buyer's Guide
    GitLab vs. HCL AppScan
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab vs. HCL AppScan and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    GitLab is ranked 7th in Application Security Tools with 70 reviews while HCL AppScan is ranked 15th in Application Security Tools with 41 reviews. GitLab is rated 8.6, while HCL AppScan is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of GitLab writes "Powerful, mature, and easy to set up and manage". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HCL AppScan writes " A stable and scalable product useful for application security scanning". GitLab is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, SonarQube, Bamboo, AWS CodePipeline and Tekton, whereas HCL AppScan is most compared with SonarQube, Veracode, Acunetix, PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional and OWASP Zap. See our GitLab vs. HCL AppScan report.

    See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors and best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

    We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.