We performed a comparison between GitLab and Inedo BuildMaster based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Build Automation."I like that it's easy to deploy our services over GitLab. The customer support is also good with a really active community. You have a lot of support that you can get online with your stack. That is probably one of the benefits of using GitLab. It's also really fast."
"It is very useful for reviews. We are using branch merging operations and full reset operations. It is also very useful for merging our code and tracking another branch. The graph diagrams of Git are very useful. Its interface is straightforward and not too complex for us."
"The solution's service delivery model is fantastic."
"The solution's most valuable feature is that it is compatible with GitHub. The product's integration capabilities are sufficient for our small company of 35 people."
"CI/CD is very good. The version control system is also good. These are the two features that we use."
"I have found the most valuable feature is security control. I also like the branching and cloning software."
"A user friendly solution."
"GitLab is very well-organized and easy to use. Also, it offers most features that customers need."
"Technical support is quick to respond. I haven't had any issues with them."
"It can be free for commercial use."
"This solution could be improved by adding modifications such as slack notifications."
"It should be used by a larger number of people. They should raise awareness."
"I would like configuration of a YML file to be done via UI rather than a code file."
"In the free version, when a merge request is raised, there is no way to enforce certain rules. We can't enforce that this merge request must be reviewed or approved by two or three people in the team before it is pushed to the master branch. That's why we are exploring using some agents."
"There was a problem with the build environment when we were looking at developing iOS applications. iOS build require Mac machines and there are no Mac machines provided by GitLab in their cloud. So to build for mobile iOS application, we needed to use our own Mac machine within our own infrastructure. If GitLab were to provide a feature such that an iOS application could also be built through GitLab directly, that would be great."
"I'm new to GitLab, so I would appreciate more documentation about the code and commands."
"Merge conflicts and repository maintenance could improve. If there is someone new to the system they would not know if there is a conflict."
"The documentation should be better. It should be very easy to call REST APIs, and the documentation has to be perfect for that."
GitLab is ranked 1st in Build Automation with 70 reviews while Inedo BuildMaster is ranked 21st in Build Automation with 1 review. GitLab is rated 8.6, while Inedo BuildMaster is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of GitLab writes "Powerful, mature, and easy to set up and manage". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Inedo BuildMaster writes "Deployment agent that allows us to deploy out to various other servers but doesn't provide build automation". GitLab is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Bamboo, SonarQube, AWS CodePipeline and Tekton, whereas Inedo BuildMaster is most compared with .
See our list of best Build Automation vendors.
We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
