We performed a comparison between Google Chrome Enterprise and Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Operating Systems (OS) for Business solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Bookmarking is very good because they are synchronized across all devices."
"Google Chrome Enterprise is a stable solution with good performance."
"The solution's most valuable feature is its browser, which offers good performance."
"We use the product to run applications and devices."
"The solution has been stable."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"Chrome functions as a comprehensive solution due to its continuous self-evaluation and improvement. The evolution process has been significant, with a notable distance covered from its inception to the present. Notably, features like VPN support have been incorporated over time, enhancing the platform's capabilities. A distinctive feature is that users don't even need to know the Wi-Fi password; upon signing into the machine, internet connectivity is established immediately. Furthermore, the cloud storage system ensures data isn't stored locally, making it seamless for users to switch between machines. In summary, Google Chrome Enterprise is an excellent solution, particularly when there's a shortage of available manpower."
"Chrome Enterprise is really easy to deploy and manage."
"The most valuable feature is the OpenShift platform."
"The tool's most valuable features are stability and maturity. Linux offers cost efficiency. Red Hat comes at the top of other Linux vendors. I am very satisfied with RHEL's maturity."
"The solution has good availability and is easy to use."
"OpenShift is the most valuable feature because it can be used to create applications on the fly."
"Their support is valuable. Whenever I had a problem, I could get on a phone call with somebody. I did not have to go to some random forum or send an email and wait forever. I could call somebody."
"The Red Hat support is most valuable. My team and I are really good at Linux, and we can do almost everything in any kind of Linux solution, but sometimes, we have a really nasty problem, and the Red Hat engineering support at the third level has been fantastic. They know how to fix almost everything. The reason why I pay so much money to them is to have this kind of service and assurance."
"The solution's SELinux feature is a gold standard for security. It also has the best ecosystem."
"Why I like it in general is that I know what it is doing. I can figure out what it is doing, and I can make it do what I want. I am not delving into arcane registry things."
"Chromebooks are hard to find in the Indonesian market."
"Google Chrome Enterprise doesn't use AI in its solution."
"The solution could be made cheaper."
"The performance could be faster."
"The product must improve its speed."
"The product's stability can be better."
"The solution's interface is an area with certain shortcomings that need improvement."
"Additional data security and data privacy features could be proactively recommended by Google."
"We're hoping that they continue to onboard open-source products into their operating system."
"The cost could be lower. Red Hat is considered a costly solution. It can be expensive if you want all the features in the license. A cheaper license would make Red Hat more accessible to a broader range of users."
"Sometimes the solution deletes our archives or other features that were useful to us."
"Red Hat Enterprise Linux should provide more training because many people are not very familiar with Linux's user interface."
"I prefer a product that offers everything in a yearly subscription, like VMware, and I think RHEL should consider offering it as well."
"It's getting easier for the community to use it free of charge. If you have an account, you get to use it. It would be better if the community could use it on their own for lab projects."
"Red Hat Enterprise Linux's documentation could be improved."
"A one-click package for hardening all files would significantly improve efficiency compared to the current manual process, especially considering the hundreds of files we've processed over the years."
More Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Google Chrome Enterprise is ranked 9th in Operating Systems (OS) for Business with 15 reviews while Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) is ranked 1st in Operating Systems (OS) for Business with 179 reviews. Google Chrome Enterprise is rated 8.6, while Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Google Chrome Enterprise writes "A scalable solution that allows its users to create, share and edit documents internally within an organization". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) writes "Highly stable, good knowledge base, and reasonable price". Google Chrome Enterprise is most compared with Island, Avira Secure Browser, Talon, Windows 10 and Oracle Solaris, whereas Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) is most compared with Windows Server, Ubuntu Linux, SUSE Linux Enterprise and Windows 10. See our Google Chrome Enterprise vs. Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) report.
See our list of best Operating Systems (OS) for Business vendors.
We monitor all Operating Systems (OS) for Business reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
