Google Cloud Bigtable vs Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Google Logo
1,797 views|1,079 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Microsoft Logo
5,375 views|2,251 comparisons
91% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Google Cloud Bigtable and Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Managed NoSQL Databases solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Google Cloud Bigtable vs. Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Bigtable is faster than other competitors in the market. It helps us collate all the data, and the security features are great. The latency is low, and the computation speed is fantastic. Bigtable is also a managed service, so you don't have to worry about anything aside from analyzing the data ingested.""The solution is very convenient.""Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.""The most valuable feature is the backup and replication service.""Stability-wise, it is a simple solution. I rate the solution's stability a ten out of ten.""It's very user-friendly where streaming data is required."

More Google Cloud Bigtable Pros →

"Cosmos DB makes life easier because if we want to use Mongo-type data, or Cassandra-type data, or maybe even just a simple cable storage-type data, then graph, there are multiple ways to do this.""The biggest benefit it offers is scalability. It's easier to work with concurrency and updating data.""From a global distribution perspective, Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB is good and easy to handle.""Cosmos is a PaaS, so you don't need to worry about infrastructure and hosting. It has various APIs that allow it to integrate with other solutions. For example, we are using a MongoDB-compatible API for customers, which makes it easier for developers on the team who previously used MongoDB or are accustomed to the old document storage paradigm.""It works reasonably fast. You can retain the original format of the document as received by the third-party system.""With Azure you can start small and grow as you need.""The solution is highly scalable.""The best feature is the velocity to make a query."

More Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB Pros →

Cons
"The lagging problem of the product I face is an area of concern where improvements are required.""This product needs better security and transparency, and the price should be reduced.""I've used Bigtable for about three or four years.""The cost of this product is too expensive.""Improvement should be made as per customer recommended and requirements.""When it comes to complex queries, a user can't get any help from a drop-down box and pick columns. It would be great if some improvements could be made in the aforementioned area concerning the solution."

More Google Cloud Bigtable Cons →

"We should have more freedom to tweak it and make our own queries for non-traditional use-cases.""A couple features that would help me in architectural solutions would be customizable architecture or customizable documentation, which both Microsoft Azure or Microsoft Teams can provide.""At this stage, we would like more enterprise support. We use MongoDB a lot, and we're trying to get rid of MongoDB. So, I would like to see more features in the Cosmos DB API for MongoDB space.""The integration of the on-premise solution with the cloud can be difficult sometimes.""The initial setup was difficult.""The solution’s pricing could be improved.""I have been a devoted Microsoft fan, but Redis DB's memory caching capabilities are really making progress. Even if Cosmos DB is continuously improving and is quite advanced in the field of internal memory optimization, I would still recommend Redis DB to a customer.""It would be nice to have more options to ingest the data, for example, more file options or more search options. Currently, you can use JSON, but if there were other file types you can use for data ingestion, that would be nice."

More Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "Cosmos should be cheaper. We actually intend to stop using it in the near future because the price is too high."
  • "There is a licensing fee."
  • "For the cloud, we don't pay for the license, but for the on-prem versions, we do pay."
  • "Cosmos DB is a PaaS, so there are no upfront costs for infrastructure. There are only subscriptions you pay for Azure and things like that. But it's a PaaS, so it's a subscription service. The license isn't perpetual, and the cost might seem expensive on its face, but you have to look at the upkeep for infrastructure and what you're saving."
  • "The price of Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB could be a bit lower."
  • "The cost is the biggest limitation of this solution."
  • "Azure is a pay as you go subscription."
  • "The RU's use case determines our license fees."
  • More Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed NoSQL Databases solutions are best for your needs.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.
    Top Answer:The lagging problem of the product I face is an area of concern where improvements are required. In general, the performance of the product needs improvement.
    Top Answer:When a client gives our organization a project where they need a dashboard for their company, they provide us with some data from their database, which is usually presented in Google Cloud Bigtable… more »
    Top Answer:The initial setup is simple and straightforward. You can set up a Cosmos DB in a day, even configuring things like availability zones around the world.
    Top Answer:With heavy use, like a large-scale IoT implementation, you could easily hit a quarter of a million dollars a month in Azure charges if Cosmos DB is a big part of it.
    Top Answer:The downside is that Cosmos is new and fairly complex. There's a limited pool of talent who are really good at working with it. Because of that, I've been approached by recruiters quite a bit; they… more »
    Ranking
    3rd
    Views
    1,797
    Comparisons
    1,079
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    365
    Rating
    9.0
    1st
    Views
    5,375
    Comparisons
    2,251
    Reviews
    30
    Average Words per Review
    512
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Microsoft Azure DocumentDB, MS Azure Cosmos DB
    Learn More
    Overview

    Cloud Bigtable is Google's NoSQL Big Data database service. It's the same database that powers many core Google services, including Search, Analytics, Maps, and Gmail.

    DocumentDB is a fully managed NoSQL database service built for fast and predictable performance, high availability, elastic scaling, global distribution, and ease of development. As a schema-free NoSQL database, DocumentDB provides rich and familiar SQL query capabilities with consistent low latencies on JSON data - ensuring that 99% of your reads are served under 10 milliseconds and 99% of your writes are served under 15 milliseconds. These unique benefits make DocumentDB a great fit for web, mobile, gaming, and IoT, and many other applications that need seamless scale and global replication.

    Sample Customers
    Cognite, Dow Jones, Loblaw Digital
    American Cancer Society, Exxon Mobil, Symantec
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    University14%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Retailer8%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company25%
    Manufacturing Company15%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Retailer8%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise68%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise21%
    Large Enterprise50%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise64%
    Buyer's Guide
    Google Cloud Bigtable vs. Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Google Cloud Bigtable vs. Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Google Cloud Bigtable is ranked 3rd in Managed NoSQL Databases with 6 reviews while Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB is ranked 1st in Managed NoSQL Databases with 38 reviews. Google Cloud Bigtable is rated 8.8, while Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Google Cloud Bigtable writes "A stable product to help resolve production-related issues". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB writes "Removes bottlenecks related to databases in our application and works quickly because of reference keys". Google Cloud Bigtable is most compared with Amazon DynamoDB and Amazon Timestream, whereas Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB is most compared with Amazon Neptune, Amazon DynamoDB, Neo4j AuraDB, Amazon DocumentDB and Amazon Timestream. See our Google Cloud Bigtable vs. Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB report.

    See our list of best Managed NoSQL Databases vendors.

    We monitor all Managed NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.