We performed a comparison between HPE Ethernet Switches and MikroTik Cloud Router Switch based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Ethernet Switches solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."These are the basic access layer switches used for connectivity among users, and they are cost-effective."
"The scalability is very good."
"HPE is very reliable because it has a lifetime warranty, so the switches didn't give us any problems."
"The simplicity of the commands is most valuable. The commands are the same for several devices."
"The product's stacking technology is stable and works well."
"The solution is very, very stable."
"The most valuable feature in HPE Ethernet Switches is programmability and analytics."
"The solution performs well for its price."
"There are a lot of features to control permitting or stopping packets in the network."
"A valuable aspect is its user-friendly configuration, making it accessible even for individuals with basic technical knowledge."
"It is user-friendly, reliable, and cheap."
"This solution is very similar to the on-premises version making it easy to use for those who know the architect."
"The initial setup is easy."
"The wiki page that describes the scripting and other features is very good."
"It is easy to set up."
"The beauty of MikroTik is that you have flexibility with the routing parts."
"It's gone up in price in the last 12 months."
"Sometimes, we encounter the need for new technologies, especially when we require higher bandwidth. If we can't find what we need with HPE Ethernet Switches, we explore options from other vendors like Cisco."
"The solution's throughput should be increased because we often get stuck when it comes to IPTV streaming."
"The product could always use better technical support."
"I would like to see the initial setup become easier."
"It is not very stable."
"The installation can be quite complex. However, that may not be the fault of HP and is rather more related to the way our infrastructure is arranged."
"The solution lacks certain protocols and has a limited warranty."
"Technical support could be better."
"It happens that you may find your network is down, if you reboot the switch, they come up. However, sometimes, they reset themselves. That's a big issue."
"The port isolation and VLAN need to be improved."
"The initial setup is complex."
"Antispam and antivirus features should be included in the future."
"Improvements are needed with respect to some of the security, especially for VPN links between vendors other than Cisco."
"The packet filtering, user log data, and user access log could all be improved."
"If MikroTik had a marketing team and support team in India then it would be much easier for us to get the product, as well as support."
HPE Ethernet Switches is ranked 11th in Ethernet Switches with 96 reviews while MikroTik Cloud Router Switch is ranked 15th in Ethernet Switches with 18 reviews. HPE Ethernet Switches is rated 8.2, while MikroTik Cloud Router Switch is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of HPE Ethernet Switches writes "Allows to monitor all the switches online so we can see what is happening and offers good security features ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of MikroTik Cloud Router Switch writes "Easy to set up, user-friendly, and reliable". HPE Ethernet Switches is most compared with Cisco Ethernet Switches, Ubiquiti UniFi Switches, H3C Ethernet Switches, Juniper EX Series Ethernet Switches and Meraki MS Switches, whereas MikroTik Cloud Router Switch is most compared with MikroTik Routers and Switches, Netgate TNSR, Huawei Enterprise Routers, Arista Networks Platform and Meraki MS Switches. See our HPE Ethernet Switches vs. MikroTik Cloud Router Switch report.
See our list of best Ethernet Switches vendors.
We monitor all Ethernet Switches reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
