We performed a comparison between HPE Ezmeral Container Platform and Kubernetes based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Amazon Web Services (AWS), VMware and others in Container Management."If customers focus on primary apps or if they are using them for data science, this is a good solution."
"One of the most valuable features is the thickness of the cloud platform or on-prem file, which makes the solution straightforward to shift and scale. It works well with different types of deployment strategies and networks."
"Kubernetes' most valuable features are scaling, deployment, and container management."
"The Desired State Configuration is a handy feature; we can deploy a certain number of pods, and the tool will ensure that the state is maintained in our desired configuration."
"The most valuable features of Kubernetes have been autoscaling and its resilience mechanisms."
"The product is highly scalable."
"Kubernetes has everything. Its design structure is quite advanced, and its offerings are extensive. The practical feature was the seamless failover."
"The self-serving feature allows our developers to grab a container and complete testing."
"Kubernetes' most valuable features include scalability and deployment."
"The modernization in Ezmeral could be improved."
"Kubernetes could adopt UI-based approach. A UI-based approach would be really useful in the CI/CD pipeline. They should make everything a little bit more user-friendly. For example, when I'm deploying, it would be nice to load my code and be able to see which components need to be connected."
"Kubernetes is a bit complex, and there's a steep learning curve. At the same time, I cannot imagine how it could be easier. You need many add-ons to it, and the commercial releases of Kubernetes should address that."
"Security could be improved. It would be helpful if there were other security modules built into Kubernetes."
"It would be very interesting if they could introduce a template engine to set dynamic values in the deployment time. It would be ideal if it could be native in Kubernetes as it would be much easier."
"The price is something they need to improve."
"This solution is not very easy to use."
"Currently, in Kubernetes, all of the health deployments or monitoring, and the discrete tools need to be configured. Changing this would make it much easier. Otherwise, we have to rely on a external tool to implement the monitoring."
"Community-based Kubernetes is quite hard to set up."
HPE Ezmeral Container Platform is ranked 17th in Container Management while Kubernetes is ranked 4th in Container Management with 73 reviews. HPE Ezmeral Container Platform is rated 7.0, while Kubernetes is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of HPE Ezmeral Container Platform writes "Easy to install with good support, but the deployment of applications could be simplified". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Kubernetes writes "Container orchestrator that deploys our machine learning solutions". HPE Ezmeral Container Platform is most compared with Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform, Amazon EKS, VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Google Kubernetes Engine and Docker, whereas Kubernetes is most compared with VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE, Amazon EKS, Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform and Cisco Container Platform.
See our list of best Container Management vendors.
We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
