We performed a comparison between IBM B2B Integrator and webMethods Trading Networks based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business-to-Business Middleware solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's highly stable, and the redundancy is amazing. B2B Integrator also has a high availability option to work in a cluster environment. You rarely have issues operating it because of the HA."
"The best feature is that many companies use the solution so there is a lot of peer support."
"B2B provides a secure communication channel."
"The most valuable features are the flexibility and the range of EDI standards that IBM Sterling can handle."
"IBM B2B Integrator is a great tool, robust, reliable, low-maintenance, and ideal solution."
"The technical support on offer through the portal is very helpful and responsive."
"The most valuable features assist with understanding data formats and transforming data."
"The solution offers good integration capabilities."
"webMethods Trading Networks is a good solution for interacting with outside of the organization. We can integrate the solutions with multiple outside the organization."
"webMethods Trading Networks is a stable solution."
"With webMethods, the creation of servers and the utilization of Trading Networks facilitate B2B integration. It resolves any related issues effectively."
"The dashboard is not integrated and should be bundled by the product vendor."
"The tool requires you to write a lot of code in Java and XSLT, which makes development tough."
"End-to-end visibility and monitoring application required. The control center is available and covers this area, but it still fails in many monitoring scenarios."
"The web interface of B2B is quite outdated and not particularly user-friendly."
"The one thing that is lacking is easy visibility. It's hard to provide business users with a view into the statuses of their transactions."
"The mapping, visibility, deployment, and the dashboard could be improved and updated. The communication logs are very poor. They are not easily understood, and we need to navigate to many places for many reasons. You can't just pull the information; it's very tough."
"The initial setup is complex."
"Patching or upgrading the product is a bit of a nightmare. It would be nice if they removed the installation manager port. We find it complicates upgrading and patching a great deal."
"The solution should include REST API calls."
"Perhaps in the area of Microservices, where I think Trading Networks could benefit from some improvements."
IBM B2B Integrator is ranked 4th in Business-to-Business Middleware with 42 reviews while webMethods Trading Networks is ranked 15th in Business-to-Business Middleware with 4 reviews. IBM B2B Integrator is rated 8.0, while webMethods Trading Networks is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of IBM B2B Integrator writes "A widely-used, on-premises solution with tons of peer support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods Trading Networks writes "Beneficial for external interactions, integrates well, and great support". IBM B2B Integrator is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services, SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite, SAP Process Orchestration and Cleo Integration Cloud Platform, whereas webMethods Trading Networks is most compared with IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services. See our IBM B2B Integrator vs. webMethods Trading Networks report.
See our list of best Business-to-Business Middleware vendors.
We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.