IBM Db2 on Cloud vs SQL Azure comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo
361 views|308 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Microsoft Logo
11,173 views|5,178 comparisons
95% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Db2 on Cloud and SQL Azure based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, MongoDB and others in Database as a Service.
To learn more, read our detailed Database as a Service Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The reliability is the most valuable feature. It is also user-friendly."

More IBM Db2 on Cloud Pros →

"The most valuable features of SQL Azure are its reliability and quick scalability.""We don't have to manage it much. It is managed by Microsoft, which makes it easy for us because there is no admin overhead for managing the servers. It is also easily scalable. During peak hours, it can scale higher.""The main advantage of it is that there is no infrastructure cost. We don't have to host it here. So, there is no infrastructure cost.""What is really helpful about the Azure SQL is that when we have a problem with our sound queries, we can trade information about what indexes we should create on tables. It's really helpful for me and also for developers.""We primarily and generally use it only for DB purposes. When it comes to the Azure part, we can easily provision, scale up, and scale down the generator machine. This kind of flexibility is the USP of SQL Azure. Its interface and ease of use are also valuable. It is very easy to use and integrate with multiple databases. If I need to pull in or import some data from my on-premises database, the ease with which you can connect and pull the data, not only from SQL Server but also from other flavors of MySQL or even Oracle, is very good.""They have good documentation. It's concentrated information.""The interface is awesome.""One of the most valuable aspects is its seamless integration with Azure Data Factory."

More SQL Azure Pros →

Cons
"I would give their support a ten if they had more tutorials available."

More IBM Db2 on Cloud Cons →

"There are some limitations for cross-database queries and features. The migration of data from older systems should be easier. For deployment, there are too many options, which sometimes makes it difficult to figure out the best option. There is not enough information to help you to find the best option for deployment. There should be more documentation about this.""We haven't had any major issues that have prevented us from doing stuff fundamentally. For its implementation, sometimes, it is complicated to understand what your needs are. It would be good to have a few use cases that provide different cloud variations that match on-premise installations and show how they can be moved to the cloud a bit better.""One of the nice features in Microsoft SQL Server is the SQL Server CLR, which we sometimes need to use to protect our procedures using C# or CLR. This is not available in the SQL Azure database.""The way it has been designed, in the on-premises deployments, the underlying Windows OS is highly scalable but has a very large resource requirement. A lot of power-related and memory-related things are there, which I have not seen in the RHEL and Oracle. I have not tried SQL on RHEL EXEC. On Windows, infrastructure-wise, a very large workload is running on the SQL. This issue is related to Windows, not SQL.""I think that the cost management in SQL is not clear because we may use some tax to identify products, but in some cases identifying the transactions in SQL is not easy for some financial cost centers.""There is so much information that it becomes confusing at times. The information can be more friendly. They could also provide additional training, especially at the beginning.""Some issues with scalability.""The solution’s visibility could be improved."

More SQL Azure Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "We have a three-year contract. The cost was somewhere around $70-80,000 for the original deployment, which was about two years ago"
  • "I'm not sure what the exact price is, but it's a moderate amount. It's not too expensive."
  • "The licensing for this solution is based on subscription."
  • "We pay less than $1000 monthly in licensing fees. There are no additional costs."
  • "It is expensive for us. We are looking for something less expensive and thinking of migrating the whole system."
  • "It is reasonable."
  • "It is quite expensive. I would definitely recommend not using the pay-as-you-go model because this will just mean all your money will go to Microsoft. So, really make sure to control resource usage as much as possible."
  • "It's reasonably priced and when you compare it with other products in the cloud environment, it's cheaper."
  • More SQL Azure Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database as a Service solutions are best for your needs.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:The automated scalability feature of SQL Azure has proven to be highly beneficial, particularly when deployed in the cloud.
    Top Answer:I recommend considering a pay-as-you-go pricing model initially.
    Top Answer:The product's pricing needs improvement.
    Ranking
    12th
    Views
    361
    Comparisons
    308
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    2nd
    Views
    11,173
    Comparisons
    5,178
    Reviews
    37
    Average Words per Review
    399
    Rating
    8.5
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    IBM
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    A fully-managed cloud SQL database. Powered by a turbo-charged Db2 engine.

    Microsoft Azure SQL Database is a relational database-as-a-service that delivers predictable performance, scalability, business continuity, data protection, and near-zero administration to cloud developers and solution architects. This is the deep technical library for Azure SQL Database.
    Sample Customers
    Owens-Illinois, KONE Corp., Cambridgeshire Fire and Rescue, Canon Europe, Delhaize America, Wimbledon
    adnymics GmbH, LG CNS, Centrebet, netfabb GmbH, MedPlast, Accelera Solutions, Sochi Organizing Committee, realzeit GmbH
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    University12%
    Computer Software Company11%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization62%
    Computer Software Company5%
    Financial Services Firm5%
    Retailer4%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise69%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business48%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise40%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business11%
    Midsize Enterprise65%
    Large Enterprise24%
    Buyer's Guide
    Database as a Service
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, MongoDB and others in Database as a Service. Updated: May 2024.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM Db2 on Cloud is ranked 12th in Database as a Service while SQL Azure is ranked 2nd in Database as a Service with 90 reviews. IBM Db2 on Cloud is rated 9.0, while SQL Azure is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of IBM Db2 on Cloud writes "Reliable and user-friendly ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SQL Azure writes "The SQL connector effectively syncs data to databases". IBM Db2 on Cloud is most compared with Google Cloud SQL and Amazon RDS, whereas SQL Azure is most compared with Google Cloud SQL, Amazon RDS, MongoDB Atlas, Oracle Database as a Service and vCloud Air.

    See our list of best Database as a Service vendors.

    We monitor all Database as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.