We performed a comparison between IBM FileNet and Mobius Content Services Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Content Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We are able to find the proper documents which are needed for business processes."
"One of our clients, a customer of IBM, rolled out and replaced their existing ECM system with FileNet. Their productivity has increased pretty dramatically."
"It improves the time when providing customer service to our constituents."
"We have probably cut out at least 40 percent of what the work process was by easing out that whole distribution of paper."
"For a large company, for the robustness, stability, performance, and the growth — that you can grow it within seconds — I would advise using FileNet, without any doubt."
"I have found that it scales well."
"The most valuable features of IBM File Manager are workflow, content, and process capabilities."
"Centralized our business documents."
"It provides a single pane of glass for delivering content from multiple repositories. It is also highly recommended because of the ease of use when it comes to searching and retrieving from multiple repositories simultaneously."
"This solution has improved our organization by providing a central repository for business data with control over sensitive data."
"The most valuable features of IBM File Manager are workflow, content, and process capabilities."
"We'd like to use the docker, to have it containerized."
"The FileNet API seems like it is very difficult and not transparent."
"The initial setup was pretty complex. There are too many options, and it can get a bit confusing."
"I think the support could be better, and it could improve."
"I think some of the technical pieces, when implementing it ourselves, were something of a roadblock until we discovered the Concierge. Those are some things they have to work on."
"The only downside is that it takes a dedicated staff to maintain it and the learning curve is pretty steep."
"It would be nice to have additional integration features, which could be integration with IoOT-based products and solutions that also have automation requirements on the IOT side. Anything can be integrated from a Gateway or API perspective would be a plus."
"The setup and the support could be improved when it comes to populating the reports from a mainframe environment."
"Sales and service need to be more consistent."
More Mobius Content Services Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM FileNet is ranked 6th in Enterprise Content Management with 94 reviews while Mobius Content Services Platform is ranked 12th in Enterprise Content Management with 3 reviews. IBM FileNet is rated 8.2, while Mobius Content Services Platform is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of IBM FileNet writes "A document management system that helps in document digitalization and workflow management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mobius Content Services Platform writes "Time from creation to access is much better, as reports are immediately available upon generation". IBM FileNet is most compared with SharePoint, OpenText Documentum, OpenText Extended ECM, IBM ECM and Oracle WebCenter, whereas Mobius Content Services Platform is most compared with IBM ECM, SharePoint and Alfresco. See our IBM FileNet vs. Mobius Content Services Platform report.
See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.