We performed a comparison between IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment and Rapid7 InsightVM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Wiz, SentinelOne and others in Vulnerability Management."The most valuable feature is that it provides a simple English recommendation on actions that you need to take once a vulnerability is discovered."
"It helped with some of the regulatory requirements. It also helped with some of the security analytics and analysis. It was worthwhile from that perspective."
"The reporting features are good and there are many built-in reports that can be quickly configured."
"This solution's most useful feature is that it is entirely a single-page application."
"It's easy to use. It's fast, it's a powerful easy to access tool."
"The product's initial setup phase was very easy."
"I like Rapid7's scan optimization options."
"The most important aspect of the solution is that it rarely gives false positives, especially compared to other products. It provides very clear reports for our IT teams to look at."
"The assessment is most valuable."
"InsightVM's most valuable feature is risk scoring, a formula based on different vectors like the ease of exploitation and the availability of the machine."
"It's a relevant management tool."
"The interface could be improved by having sub-groups of tests, ultimately making the process of collecting tests faster."
"Building policies is not that easy. There are some things that are turned off by default, for example, displaying values."
"It was not as easy to use. The user-friendliness of it was somewhat lower than what I was expecting. It was also lacking in terms of the ease of the setup. There should be an automatic agent for deployment."
"Some difficulties with the online reporting and lack of integrations."
"I would say that it improved our visibility, but it left things open."
"The solution should include a tighter integration with third-party threat modeling and threat intelligence tools."
"Rapid7 InsightVM could be easier to use for those who are using it for the first time."
"It would be great to have a mobile application client. Currently, you have to use a mobile web browser on a device, but it is not similar to the desktop web browser in terms of user experience. It would be nice to have a mobile application to access the platform."
"There have been instances where technical support takes a long time to update the status of a ticket, which is something that can be improved."
"Rapid7 could be easier to manage."
"Some of our customers want to be completely cloud based, and Rapid7 doesn't offer this as an option."
More IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment is ranked 40th in Vulnerability Management with 3 reviews while Rapid7 InsightVM is ranked 4th in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 55 reviews. IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment is rated 6.6, while Rapid7 InsightVM is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment writes "Worthwhile from the regulatory requirements and analytics perspective, but is expensive and not easy to use". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Rapid7 InsightVM writes "You can scan a network, and receive recommendations to address vulnerabilities with the click of a button". IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Orca Security and Acunetix, whereas Rapid7 InsightVM is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Tenable Security Center, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Wiz.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.