We performed a comparison between IBM InfoSphere Optim and Oracle Enterprise Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Database Development and Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We like that we can easily restore the database with just a few clicks. The database is linked as well."
"I feel the solution to be a bit faster than the traditional methods, which makes it easy to customize."
"We use it extensively for performance tuning testing, monitoring, and configuration."
"We can manage everything in our environment."
"It's a useful feature to be able to see the top SQL, the number of executions, the CPU, and the resources that it's using."
"With ASH Analytics, ADDM, Real-Time SQL Monitoring, SQL Tuning Advisor, we can measure SLAs, detect performance hotspots, perform deep diagnostics into specific tiers, tune applications, and remediate."
"The dashboards are great for gathering analytic information and seeing where the problems are."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is a very user-friendly tool."
"Due to the infrastructure's size, the introduction they offer is very, very useful. It helps with an overall understanding of the product."
"It's easy to implement as it's made by Oracle for Oracle."
"We're looking for a solution that can be implemented on AWS. IBM InfoSphere Optim can be implemented on AWS, but it costs more than double what we're currently paying. So, it's not really of good value for us."
"While the solution is very supportive of Db2, it is not so friendly when it comes to IMS databases."
"I would like to improve the cost."
"My opinion is that this solution needs to improve consolidation. That is what our business needs the most right now."
"Patching. It's extremely difficult to determine what requires patching and the process to patch each component is slightly different."
"Reporting and statistical charting is largely still left up the end-user to develop custom solutions."
"RMAN tools need improvement."
"The solution is considered expensive."
"It needs to support the Database versions lower than 10.2."
"The solution’s pricing could be improved."
IBM InfoSphere Optim is ranked 15th in Database Development and Management with 3 reviews while Oracle Enterprise Manager is ranked 1st in Database Development and Management with 123 reviews. IBM InfoSphere Optim is rated 6.6, while Oracle Enterprise Manager is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of IBM InfoSphere Optim writes "Can easily restore the database, but the cost needs to be reduced". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Enterprise Manager writes "Provides good stability and has an easy implementation process". IBM InfoSphere Optim is most compared with Solix Enterprise Data Management, Informatica Data Archive and Informatica Persistent Data Masking, whereas Oracle Enterprise Manager is most compared with Zabbix, Quest Spotlight, Dynatrace, AppDynamics and Quest Foglight for Databases. See our IBM InfoSphere Optim vs. Oracle Enterprise Manager report.
See our list of best Database Development and Management vendors.
We monitor all Database Development and Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.