We performed a comparison between IBM Integration Bus and Oracle Service Bus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is very straightforward. It is very user-friendly integration."
"The product is usually very easy to deploy."
"IBM Integration Bus has a complete set of tools that are implemented between rules when it comes to run time, but it's not easy to understand."
"The solution is stable and can scale relatively easily."
"We can have multiple endpoints, and we can integrate different applications from different platforms. In a large-scale enterprise setup, it becomes so easy to establish communication between applications. You can connect an application to other applications, other legacy applications, and databases. You can also connect with those applications that are in the cloud. You can connect with other well-known applications, such as Salesforce, SAP, and Workday, by using IBM Integration Bus."
"From a performance point of view, it's very good and it doesn't need very much in terms of CPU resources."
"The product is a user-customized tool so that you can adjust it to your specific needs pretty well with little trouble."
"The message queue, like, message queue connectors. Then they have a built in connectors for most of the systems, like SAP, oracle database, and this Civil connector is there. Of course, we have this SQL database connector So those built in connectors are there. For the almost most of the systems, we have built in connectors. And second thing is that it is a stateless Integration, so it doesn't maintain a state of the integration. Bus the Stitches Integration makes it very fast."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is that you can connect with different applications."
"The interface is fine and the solution is quite robust."
"I am a part of the software developing team and I mainly use this solution for the integrating applications."
"Overall it is a pretty good solution."
"The stability is consistently high, with only one notable issue encountered."
"The routing and aggregation are the most valuable features. It's split and join."
"Its ease of use is valuable. It's very easy to use. It's no code/low code. Oracle Middleware products are also rich in adapters."
"It is stable."
"I believe there is room for improvement in the pricing structure to make it more accessible."
"In terms of improvement, the UI should be more user-friendly."
"To scale virtically, is difficult."
"The product could be improved by including more resources on SQL."
"The memory footprint should be minimized."
"The solution is complex and there is a need for more resources and greatly improved quality."
"I would like to see more metered rest and API support. IBM is already working on it on Version 11, but it still needs improvement."
"The solution needs to improve it's security and its proactive notification of security issues."
"This solution would benefit from having more cloud-based adapters."
"This solution should work better with RESTful services."
"We have faced a problem with the heap memory side, but that is stable now."
"The pricing of the product could be better. It's a bit high."
"What needs improvement in Oracle Service Bus is the connectivity between adapters such as the Salesforce adapter and database adapters. The limited number of adapters compatible with Oracle Service Bus makes you want to switch to a different solution."
"There are issues, especially if you want to create some compensation in your service bin."
"The support for GraphQL needs to be improved, and the response time for global support could be faster."
"The connectivity with the solution is an area that needs to be improved. On occasion, requests are lost due to losing connectivity."
IBM Integration Bus is ranked 1st in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 65 reviews while Oracle Service Bus is ranked 6th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 25 reviews. IBM Integration Bus is rated 8.0, while Oracle Service Bus is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of IBM Integration Bus writes "Scalable solution with efficient integration features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Service Bus writes "Enables us to do a lot of aggregation and routing, but API response can be a problem if the payload is heavy". IBM Integration Bus is most compared with Mule ESB, webMethods Integration Server, IBM WebSphere Message Broker, IBM DataPower Gateway and Red Hat Fuse, whereas Oracle Service Bus is most compared with Mule ESB, webMethods Integration Server, Red Hat Fuse, WSO2 Enterprise Integrator and TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus. See our IBM Integration Bus vs. Oracle Service Bus report.
See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.