We performed a comparison between IBM Rational DOORS and PTC Integrity Requirements Connector based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Atlassian, Siemens and others in Application Requirements Management."The most valuable feature of IBM Rational DOORS is the full requirements development and testing."
"It is a stable solution."
"Starting to use the solution is pretty straightforward. There isn't too much of a learning curve."
"I like being able to sort and categorize the requirements and the exporting functions."
"When you install DOORS locally, you have the flexibility to do what you want with the solution. You can add functionality and do many things that you can't do with other tools or do well enough to satisfy your users' requirements."
"I really like the customization that can be done using the DOORS Extension Language (DXL)."
"Makes good work of prioritizing and planning product delivery."
"It is very customizable and easy to scale."
"It is a stable solution...I rate the support a nine out of ten."
"Rational DOORS' most valuable feature is that you can write any kind of requirement you want."
"It could be more user-friendly. It's not a beautiful tool. The user interface is gray. It has only lists inside, and it's horrible when you want to add tables. It's tough to add tables and manage them. It also becomes difficult when you want to add images."
"The kind of dashboard is not very convenient."
"There needs to be quicker access to tech support. When I have a two minute question that takes two minutes to answer, it shouldn't take me 45 minutes and/or a few days of callbacks to get to the right technical support person. It's unnecessary and frustrating for the user."
"I would like to see them improve in agile management the Scrum/Kanban Board to work with overseas team members."
"One thing that I would like to see is a lower-cost version of it that we could use for smaller projects. Sometimes, we do projects for commercial customers who would benefit from something like DOORS, but it's just so expensive. It's just a monster, so a lower-cost version would be the thing that we'd like to see."
"It would be helpful if Microsoft provided a more user-friendly interface for updating and querying updates. Additionally, if there was a way for users to notify developers of any changes in requirements, it would allow for faster and more efficient updates to the solution's architecture. This could be in the form of a notification system that alerts developers of any changes that need to be made. Additionally, the solution is document-driven and it should be more digital."
"The low performance of the solution is probably because it is quite an old tool."
"The training material for PTC Integrity should be made a little bit easier or more useful for the user."
IBM Rational DOORS is ranked 1st in Application Requirements Management with 51 reviews while PTC Integrity Requirements Connector is ranked 6th in Application Requirements Management with 1 review. IBM Rational DOORS is rated 8.0, while PTC Integrity Requirements Connector is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM Rational DOORS writes " Offers ability to automate tasks and to track changes within documents and compare different versions of requirements but modeling capabilities could benefit from a web-based tool ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PTC Integrity Requirements Connector writes "A requirement management tool that provides a good technical support along with stability". IBM Rational DOORS is most compared with Polarion Requirements, Jira, Jama Connect, Helix ALM and 3SL Cradle, whereas PTC Integrity Requirements Connector is most compared with Jira and IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation.
See our list of best Application Requirements Management vendors.
We monitor all Application Requirements Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.