We performed a comparison between IBM Security QRadar and ManageEngine Log360 based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."This console gives you the entire view, which makes life easier and allows you to take precautionary measures."
"The solution can scale."
"The most valuable features would have to be the products' ability to customize vulnerability management settings."
"What's most valuable in IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics is its higher availability than other tools."
"It has a good integration with the artificial intelligence engine of Watson."
"It helps us discover any threats with their alerts and tracking."
"Overall a great solution."
"The most valuable feature is the machine learning module."
"The most valuable feature is that this solution is more secure than others, and there are more applications and features as well."
"The deployment is quite simple and pretty straightforward."
"ManageEngine Log360 is not difficult to deploy."
"The reporting is great. Everything you need is in the report for you already."
"The product is very user-friendly."
"The solution could be improved by including XDR, remediation and Sandbox."
"You can have all of the logs from servers to network and it gets sent out to the correct owners. This is very helpful."
"It is nice to be able to monitor and to have notifications."
"The IBM support can be better."
"This solution is on-premise and many customers are moving to the cloud base solution."
"QRadar UBA only keeps the data for a short while (it's refreshed every five minutes) and would be improved if this were extended to a week or month."
"QVM is another instance where they need to revise the vulnerability scoring and the proper remediation details."
"The threat intelligence functionality can be better. In addition, it can have more monitoring capabilities."
"There needs to be better integration with other applications."
"The usability of interfaces could be improved."
"IBM Security QRadar’s GUI could be improved."
"The support needs improvement."
"Their technical support should be improved."
"The integration with SharePoint and Teams should be improved."
"The graphical interface could be made easier to use when you are connecting to different network equipment."
"The matter of the data retention needs to be addressed."
"It takes a little bit of time for Log360 to actually learn your environment."
"There is room for improvement, especially in the reporting aspect. The reports are not as good as those in Splunk."
"It's difficult to find which conditions have been applied to a report because they are provided by default by ManageEngine. However, with other SIEMs if you want to create a report, they provide details, like which conditions are triggering certain reports. This needs to be there in ManageEngine. It would be good to know which parameter has been applied to the report that is updating the system."
IBM Security QRadar is ranked 6th in Log Management with 198 reviews while ManageEngine Log360 is ranked 28th in Log Management with 15 reviews. IBM Security QRadar is rated 8.0, while ManageEngine Log360 is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of IBM Security QRadar writes "A highly stable and scalable solution that provides good technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ManageEngine Log360 writes "Facilitates incident backtracking and identifying the cause of incidents but insufficient intelligence-driven analysis to suppress unnecessary alerts". IBM Security QRadar is most compared with Splunk Enterprise Security, Microsoft Sentinel, Wazuh, LogRhythm SIEM and Elastic Security, whereas ManageEngine Log360 is most compared with ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer, Wazuh, Splunk Enterprise Security, Fortinet FortiSIEM and Fortinet FortiAnalyzer. See our IBM Security QRadar vs. ManageEngine Log360 report.
See our list of best Log Management vendors, best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors, and best User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.