We performed a comparison between Imperva DDoS and Palo Alto Networks WildFire based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cloudflare, NETSCOUT, Akamai and others in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection."The dashboard is good and user-friendly."
"Scalability is pretty easy on the base platform. You just add another, and you're ready to go."
"It's very pretty easy to onboard the URL."
"Imperva Incapsula has many valuable features. One, it protects the top 10 OWAS vulnerability, the open web application software platform, this is standard. Secondly, it protects against broken authentication. As well, it has remote execution of code."
"The three-second service level agreement is already better than the competition."
"Technical support was very helpful."
"On the site security, I can see which countries have incidents, whether it was a robot attack, a real human user, or non-human user."
"It blocks all types of attacks."
"Installing this product as a datacenter firewall for segregation and segmentation, and also configuring policies between zones has improved my organization."
"The most valuable features of Palo Alto Networks WildFire are the good URL and file analysis that uses artificial intelligence. It has different interfaces, such as rest, SMTP protocol, and HTTPS. The Security incidents and event management are very good. Additionally, there are many file types that are supported and there is no limit to the number of files it can handle simultaneously. It integrates well with SIEM solutions."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is how it keeps up-to-date with viruses."
"The reporting feature helps our performance."
"Stability is never a concern."
"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."
"Being an application-based firewall, this is one of the critical focus factors along with the threat prevention services it provides."
"The solution has plenty of features."
"The salespeople tend to exaggerate its capabilities, which can cost you money if you don't verify the information."
"Imperva should have more points of presence in Africa."
"We had an issue when securing the web applications for DDoS protection."
"Users would benefit from better documentation. There is official documentation, but sometimes we need more detail. We have some use cases that are not so run of the mill. It would be great if there was a knowledge base that we could go to for more answers."
"It's quite expensive."
"A limited tool if you're looking to customize."
"Some maintenance must be performed by our IT team."
"There’s nothing that’s missing in terms of features."
"In the future, I would like to see more automation in the reporting."
"The initial setup was a little bit complex, mainly due to the GUI console and management challenges."
"The only complaint that we receive from our customers is in regards to the price."
"They provide a medium level of technical support."
"The automation and responsiveness need improvement."
"There are certain changes that I was expecting in the previous version, and I hope that they are soon fixed. All of the problems that I have faced so far have been resolved."
"The cost of this solution could still be improved, in particular, giving product discounts for charitable causes."
"The cost of the solution is excessively high."
Imperva DDoS is ranked 7th in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection with 74 reviews while Palo Alto Networks WildFire is ranked 3rd in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) with 58 reviews. Imperva DDoS is rated 8.8, while Palo Alto Networks WildFire is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Imperva DDoS writes "I like the content monitoring feature which I haven't seen in other WAF solutions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks WildFire writes "Good technical support and provides automatic analysis that saves us time in filtering email". Imperva DDoS is most compared with Cloudflare, Akamai, Arbor DDoS, Radware DefensePro and AWS WAF, whereas Palo Alto Networks WildFire is most compared with Cisco Secure Firewall, Fortinet FortiGate, Juniper SRX Series Firewall, Proofpoint Email Protection and Fortinet FortiSandbox.
We monitor all Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.