We performed a comparison between Imperva DDoS and Qualys VMDR based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cloudflare, NETSCOUT, Akamai and others in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection."Imperva DDoS is fairly stable, and its availability is quite high."
"The technical support is excellent."
"On the activity log, I can see the exact details, the visit, and the threat."
"Gives us the ability to trace each connection, and to have logs to be able to differentiate between a positive and a false-positive intruder action."
"It is a stable solution."
"On the real time, you can see live traffic, which is flowing into our website."
"This product is a reliable defense from malicious attacks on a network environment."
"The dashboard is good and user-friendly."
"It is quite easy to implement."
"This solution gives us insight into our environment and improves our security. It helps us to maintain a good patching system whereby we know that XYZ is vulnerable within the system."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The most valuable features are vulnerability scanning, policy compliance scanning, and tablet for web application scanning."
"I am impressed with the VMDR feature."
"Provides great functionality."
"The most valuable feature of Qualys Container Security is the detailed information in the reports and the remediation. This is done to make sure there are no vulnerabilities."
"It gives a very good overview of the inventory assessment process, and it can be accessed across our company because it's a global tool."
"I miss being able to integrate the dashboard with other BI tools we are using. We have to export and import data to be able to present it, and doing so is a lot of work."
"The log analytics interface within Incapsula isn't really good. For example, if you have to get all logs from there, it's a very cumbersome process."
"I would like to see automated reporting to improve visibility."
"It needs to be improved every time there are new attacks."
"The solution needs to improve Integration with third parties for their on-prem deployment models. The integration is not that good yet."
"It's quite expensive."
"The salespeople tend to exaggerate its capabilities, which can cost you money if you don't verify the information."
"Its price could be improved. It is quite expensive. It will be good if we could export the configuration. Currently, to control the configuration, we need to go to each website, which is not very convenient."
"It is more expensive vs. other products on the market."
"It's quite complex on the way it is set up, so it takes a fair bit of time in order to get your head around it in order to deploy it. Once you've deployed it, then you're never confident on the versions of the browsers and the SSL certificates, etc. You have to always go back into Qualys and check."
"Qualys VM's vulnerability scan could be improved, especially the number of CVE numbers it can manage at a time."
"We are moving away from Qualys to Defender ATP because I find that Defender ATP is much better at prioritizing the vulnerabilities that I should be looking at."
"I do not like that all of the data is stored on the cloud."
"Qualys could improve the inbuilt dashboards."
"Certain integration factors between different options could be improved."
"The reporting in this solution can be improved."
Imperva DDoS is ranked 7th in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection with 74 reviews while Qualys VMDR is ranked 3rd in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 77 reviews. Imperva DDoS is rated 8.8, while Qualys VMDR is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Imperva DDoS writes "I like the content monitoring feature which I haven't seen in other WAF solutions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Qualys VMDR writes "Good visibility but expensive and needs better support". Imperva DDoS is most compared with Cloudflare, Akamai, Arbor DDoS, Radware DefensePro and AWS WAF, whereas Qualys VMDR is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Tenable Security Center, Rapid7 InsightVM, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Tenable Vulnerability Management.
We monitor all Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.