We performed a comparison between Infoblox IPAM and SolarWinds IPAM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two IP Address Management (IPAM) Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."This is a DDI solution and having one management control has been most useful."
"The graphical user interface is very user-friendly and simple to use. It is very simple to use if you have never used it before."
"Regarding DDI, I would say the best feature of Infoblox is the DNS security. DNS tunneling is a significant security issue and is very difficult to protect against based on our tests with other types of security devices. However, Infoblox eliminates this issue and provides excellent security against a difficult threat."
"Infoblox IPAM provides visibility into what's on your network and helps fingerprint devices based on the OS, manufacturer, and other things along those lines."
"We can specify the availability of subnets when we create them."
"Infoblox gives us the flexibility to manage our internal networks and publish the data outside of the network on the internet. It's quite fluid to do it."
"It provides us with flexibility."
"The most important feature of Infoblox IPAM for my clients is its reliability."
"SolarWinds IPAM is a simple and user-friendly tool."
"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The most valuable feature of SolarWinds IPAM is its automated IP address management. Instead of working with Excel sheets, it's automated and saves a lot of time and effort. Additionally, it is adaptable, IT managers enjoy it, and it is high quality."
"The product is user-friendly and valuable."
"I would recommend this solution for all companies that have to deal with a lot of networks."
"The initial setup is straightforward. It takes about half a day, and it can be done by one engineer."
"I am impressed with the product's reports."
"Its setup is simple. Its interface is simple. It's very easy to manage."
"When we do a host entry, it also reflects in the lookup. We should be able to filter that part. If we do only the A and PTR records, we need to reflect only that part in the lookup."
"How you track IPs within a subnet and how all of that works was not intuitive to me. If I compare it to VitalQIP, I create a subnet, and it's a slash 24 size. It's very easy. I look, and here are my 254 IPs. I can then see if I have assigned a static, do I have a DHCP scope, and what's the name of the device. That's all there in front of me. The thing that I found frustrating with Infoblox was that it was not very intuitive."
"Infoblox IPAM has improved and is better, but it needs to have an external GSLB functionality. Currently, the solution has a GLSB functionality for internal appliances, but for an external user, that functionality doesn't exist. Infoblox IPAM also needs some improvement on its threat engine and RPZ policies, or DNS firewall or DNS policies. An additional feature I'd like to see in Infoblox IPAM is zero-touch provisioning in terms of the appliances. Currently, there's zero-touch provisioning for cloud-based devices, but for physical appliances in branches, there's none, so you still have to do some configurations. For example, if you have existing DNS infrastructure and you need to set up Infoblox IPAM in new branches, and you need more appliances, you should be able to just plug the solution into the network, and there shouldn't be any manual interference required."
"The scope of our use of this solution is limited to the DDI IPAM solution for Infoblox. This solution could be improved by offering multiple integrations with IPAM which could already exist but we aren't aware of them."
"The solution is not easy to use; the GUI and CLI are challenging to use, limiting end-user capability. We can't use Linux terminal features with Infoblox, as it struggles to detect and troubleshoot problems. We generally use troubleshooting tools like tcpdump in our network security area and we can use that in Infoblox with limited features."
"The only room for improvement in Infoblox IPAM is its compatibility and flexibility with IPv6. There's been an issue transitioning from IPv4 to IPv6, and though Infoblox is in the process of resolving the issue, it would be better if the team could come up with a solution in a quicker timeframe. Better transitioning from IPv4 to IPv6 is what I'd like to see in the next release of the solution."
"An area for improvement is IPAM's smart folders, which can be slow to access and would benefit from a search feature."
"It is challenging to find training tutorials online."
"SolarWinds IPAM offers premium support, but the customer has to pay more money, and then they will have minimal response times."
"The product needs to improve its support. The response time is long and not very helpful."
"My understanding is that IPAM cannot be used for the AWS environment. I might be wrong, but that's what I believe it cannot do. On AWS, SolarWinds IPAM cannot do what it does on the on-prem side. They should explore how to make IPAM capable and scalable on AWS and Azure environments."
"They should provide more details on the full stack feature. It needs to be integrated with the hypervisor."
"Sometimes we have to wait for screens to load, so faster operations would be better."
"From any improvement perspective, SolarWinds IPAM should consider working on the area where the tool lacks, which is its network management capabilities."
"I would like more updates."
"Some processes are a little bit bumpy. The solution needs a design refresh."
Infoblox IPAM is ranked 1st in IP Address Management (IPAM) Tools with 15 reviews while SolarWinds IPAM is ranked 3rd in IP Address Management (IPAM) Tools with 10 reviews. Infoblox IPAM is rated 9.0, while SolarWinds IPAM is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Infoblox IPAM writes "Plug-and-play, stable, scalable, and lets you manage everything from the cloud; has professional technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SolarWinds IPAM writes "A stable and scalable tool meant for IP address management". Infoblox IPAM is most compared with BlueCat Integrity, BT Diamond IP, NetBox.dev, Micetro and Device42, whereas SolarWinds IPAM is most compared with ManageEngine OpUtils, BlueCat Integrity, NetBox.dev and Micetro. See our Infoblox IPAM vs. SolarWinds IPAM report.
See our list of best IP Address Management (IPAM) Tools vendors.
We monitor all IP Address Management (IPAM) Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.