We performed a comparison between Infobright DB and MySQL based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Relational Databases Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It has very amazing smart grid query feature for very fast aggregate queries across millions of rows"
"MySQL is a scalable tool. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...The solution's technical support is good. I rate the technical support a nine out of ten."
"I would use MySQL for a medium project, with around 1,00,000 hundred thousand users, because of the indexing and stored procedures."
"We use MySQL for enterprise data storage as well as part of the back-end of websites and web applications."
"What I really like about MySQL is the opportunity to search for information and organize it any way I like."
"It's a mature solution that's been around for decades."
"It is easy to use."
"The tool is open-source and there is no cost involved in its use."
"The feature that I have found most valuable is its ubiquity. MySQL is everywhere, so if I need to find a developer to do things to it that I don't know, it's very easy to find someone who has expertise in it."
"Only the data from the columns that reached 2GB will actually decrease. Other columns below 2GB in size do not leave the disk."
"We have encountered some performance issues, and the solution takes time for performing complex queries."
"It can have better monitoring. In addition, the enterprise manager should be able to cater to more than one virtual machine. Currently, you need one license per server. It seems a bit too much to get one license for one enterprise manager. I hope the enterprise manager for MySQL can accommodate more virtual machines for MySQL."
"Improvements to MySQL depend on the specific use case. For example, in my scenario, I frequently need to maintain and store data, which can then be utilized to generate reports. On the other hand, others may suggest incorporating a feature that allows for easier visualization of the data, such as what is available in Power BI or other similar tools."
"They should come up with a better solution than the NDB cluster for better scaling. If they could come up with a better solution for write scaling, apart from the NDB cluster, which is supported by all open source communities, that would be great. Although the NDB cluster, I believe, is an open-source tool, it's not widely supported as a solution."
"Stability needs improvement and the backup needs to be enhanced."
"The replication needs improvement. It's becoming a native cloud product like Oracle DB or Cockroach DB."
"The analytics features are in need of improvement."
"It could be more secure."
Earn 20 points
Infobright DB is ranked 30th in Relational Databases Tools while MySQL is ranked 4th in Relational Databases Tools with 142 reviews. Infobright DB is rated 7.6, while MySQL is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Infobright DB writes "If you need a real big data solution, look for a distributed solution that actually has a proven track record". On the other hand, the top reviewer of MySQL writes "Good beginner base but it should have better support for backups". Infobright DB is most compared with LocalDB, whereas MySQL is most compared with Firebird SQL, PostgreSQL, MariaDB, Teradata and SAP HANA. See our Infobright DB vs. MySQL report.
See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.
We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.