We performed a comparison between Infor dEPM and Oracle Hyperion based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Performance Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The planning capability is the most valuable feature."
"Our customers have the solution deployed on the cloud or on-premises. The deployment took about a month."
"Infor dEPM's got the best end-user reporting solution that keeps us motivated and moving forward with this solution only."
"You can get the data directly from the database with Excel formulas."
"It is easy to use. It is very intuitive. Even though there is a lot of functionality that comes out of the box, you can customize the solutions to meet your needs. You have the ability to have business rules that produce all kinds of calculations. We're international, and we do all our FX conversions through that."
"The stability is fine and quite user friendly."
"We have found there is excellent stability with Oracle Hyperion."
"Functionality-wise, it is what they say it is. It is the best in class, but it all ties back to your users. If your users are completely enamored with Excel spreadsheets, then breaking those habits is hard."
"This product is very scalable and provides high ROI."
"Scalability is one of this solution's big plus points."
"The latest cloud version is more efficient for financial implementations."
"The scalability is good."
"The latest version has been cloud-enabled, but it requires a deeper understanding of programming skills compared to the previous versions, which were more user-friendly."
"The initial setup from a user perspective can be cumbersome and has room for improvement."
"It's a very expensive solution."
"The usability could be better."
"The analytics could be improved."
"Oracle EPM Cloud solutions have simplified the security model. Nevertheless, it would be better having a more differentiated security model."
"The solution is about to cease to exist, so it doesn't really matter if they add anything to it. It's at end-of-life."
"The interface could be better. It could be more user-friendly, it is not very intuitive."
"It is challenging to do reporting on Oracle Hyperion if you're not an expert."
"They could support machine learning algorithms for the product."
"From a technical perspective, the technical support could be improved and the price could be reduced."
"Their documentation could be a little bit more descriptive at places. They don't really do a lot of How-Tos because that gets pushed through to the consulting groups. There have been some books. There is a real good one out there about how to look smarter than you are with Hyperion Planning that some people at a company called ArganoInterRel wrote. Those things do exist, but that's not in their documentation. It's basically like they'll say, "This is the field. This is what it's used for," but they don't tell you how to particularly use it in your case environment."
Infor dEPM is ranked 15th in Business Performance Management with 12 reviews while Oracle Hyperion is ranked 2nd in Business Performance Management with 51 reviews. Infor dEPM is rated 7.8, while Oracle Hyperion is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Infor dEPM writes "Good report management, highly stable, and customizable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Hyperion writes "A world-class solution that provides a lot of functionality out of the box and also allows you to customize it to meet your needs". Infor dEPM is most compared with IBM Cognos, Jedox and Domo, whereas Oracle Hyperion is most compared with Tableau, IBM Cognos, Anaplan, Oracle HFM and Domo. See our Infor dEPM vs. Oracle Hyperion report.
See our list of best Business Performance Management vendors.
We monitor all Business Performance Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
