We performed a comparison between Informatica Data Quality and Microsoft Data Quality Services based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Informatica, SAP, Talend and others in Data Quality."Seeing the data in the mapping itself is really nice."
"I do find Informatica Data Quality is stable. It generally maintains a high level of reliability and stability, making it an asset."
"The profiling feature in Informatica Data Quality is incredibly effective for data governance."
"I like the connectivity and richness of features for the technical team, the maturity of the product, and that it had a cloud version. There is Informatica Cloud, and it is part of the Informatica Cloud platform."
"The solution is stable."
"We use it for various use cases, including data provisioning, data validation, continuous monitoring of data quality, and data standardization."
"We are able to set rules, establish a data quality management platform, and monitor the quality."
"There are a couple of valuable features. One is that it is very quick on the profiling. So, you get a very fast snapshot of the type of data that you're looking at from the profiling perspective. It can highlight anomalies in the data."
"This solution is particularly useful for data enrichment."
"The ability of the product to leverage the power of big data could be improved."
"It can be improved in terms of performance and execution. I'm expecting better performance. It currently has some restrictions in terms of execution. For example, if we want to run it in the command mode and execute it, there are some restrictions, and we are facing some issues with a huge volume of data. These restrictions are not there in Informatica PowerCenter because we are able to execute a huge volume of data, and there are more ways to execute it."
"Although we are very satisfied with the design of the UI, executing tasks with it can be difficult."
"The tool's performance is an area that should be given further consideration."
"Their UI needs improvement. Their scorecards and reporting also need improvement. Their data quality reporting, especially their dashboards and scorecards, is lackluster at best. Its reporting capabilities are limited. If you want to do anything beyond its limited reporting capabilities, then you're going to have to use an external reporting tool such as Power BI or something like that."
"There is room for improvement in the Data Marketplace aspect."
"The customer servive and support could be faster. There is a slow turnaround."
"One area that could use improvement is the speed of the web interfaces. At present, they are very slow. I think it is essential that we are original and robust on-premises."
"I would rate my experience with the initial setup a six out of ten, with one being very easy and ten being extremely challenging. So, there is room for improvement in the setup process."
More Microsoft Data Quality Services Pricing and Cost Advice →
Informatica Data Quality is ranked 1st in Data Quality with 18 reviews while Microsoft Data Quality Services is ranked 14th in Data Quality with 1 review. Informatica Data Quality is rated 7.8, while Microsoft Data Quality Services is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Informatica Data Quality writes "Offers cloud version, good connectivity and data profiling features ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Data Quality Services writes " Usefulness of data enrichment features, which can help improve data quality and accuracy". Informatica Data Quality is most compared with Informatica Cloud Data Quality, Talend Data Quality, Trillium Quality, Oracle Data Quality and SAP Data Quality Management, whereas Microsoft Data Quality Services is most compared with .
See our list of best Data Quality vendors.
We monitor all Data Quality reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.