We performed a comparison between Ipanema IpIengine and Steelhead based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two WAN Optimization solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.Earn 20 points
Ipanema IpIengine is ranked 11th in WAN Optimization while Steelhead is ranked 3rd in WAN Optimization with 23 reviews. Ipanema IpIengine is rated 8.0, while Steelhead is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Ipanema IpIengine writes "We like the Dynamic WAN selection and Dynamic QoS. It's important to select the right device at the start". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Steelhead writes "Exceptionally stable and reliable but costly". Ipanema IpIengine is most compared with , whereas Steelhead is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform, WAAS, Citrix SD-WAN and Noction IRP. See our Ipanema IpIengine vs. Steelhead report.
See our list of best WAN Optimization vendors.
We monitor all WAN Optimization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.