We performed a comparison between Jamf Connect and Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ZTNA as a Service solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's a good and stable tool, so you should use it if you have a need."
"Jamf Connect is an identity provider, and once you log in, you will have all the device's access."
"I would rate the product's scalability an eight out of ten."
"The tool supports different types of authentication. It also integrates seamlessly if you are using other Jamf products."
"The solution is scalable."
"The most valuable feature is ease of access. It's convenient to do things like resetting passwords. Previously, users were bound to their domain. We had to bind the user to the domain and log them in through the AD. Now, using Jamf Connect, we don't face any of these challenges. Resetting passwords is hassle-free so we can regularly rotate passwords according to best practices."
"The most valuable feature is the synchronization of passwords with a local password, which works well."
"Jamf Connect allows for easy and seamless joining of Mac devices to Azure AD, eliminating the need for third-party involvement or support engineer assistance."
"It does the job. What it is needed for. I can use it for VPN, I can use it for secure connections, I can use it as a firewall. So the solution does the job."
"The solution offers a simplified network infrastructure and security functions and it enables secure remote access for the users"
"The ZPA is a unique feature which offers VPN along with all the additional security needed."
"Yes, it is very stable. I have never seen it go down, not once."
"It is easy to use."
"Users get direct secure access to applications over the internet."
"The most valuable feature is the manageability of the micro tunnels."
"The product's most valuable features are cloud-based services and secure internet access. We don't have to set up any physical appliances."
"We have faced issues with the product's configuration. If we use the tool with other business manager solutions, then there is the issue of naming conventions. The tool needs to be careful with newer updates so that it doesn't break any of the existing configurations."
"We've had some issues when users restart their devices because the device asks for credentials afterward. Jamf Connect asks for a username, password, and MFA."
"Jamf Connect is beginning to implement Multi-Factor Authentication for offline authentication, but the setup documentation is insufficient."
"When a Mac is joined to Azure, the generic Pro console in the MDM should accurately display the Mac as joined to Azure in the inventory section. Currently, it shows "no domain account found," which can be misleading."
"The solution’s technical support is bad and should be improved."
"The logs are an area with a shortcoming."
"The configuration could be faster."
"Overall, there is a lack of consistent experience sometimes with some of their features."
"The pricing for Private Access seems to be on the expensive side, and I believe they should consider making it more competitive with other solutions."
"The granularity in blocking is not sufficient, as new domains are automatically blocked for 30 days without further information."
"An area for improvement would be the ease of configuration."
"Users report application access or latency issues with Zscaler Private Access."
"The stability could be improved."
"There could be more DLP-related features. Additionally, there needs to be flexibility for integrating ISP features."
"More on-prem infrastructure is required when Zscaler Private Access is to be implemented as a single point of entry."
"There are latency issues with the solution. They are small, however, they are there when you compare it to other vendors."
Jamf Connect is ranked 8th in ZTNA as a Service with 10 reviews while Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange is ranked 1st in ZTNA as a Service with 34 reviews. Jamf Connect is rated 9.4, while Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Jamf Connect writes "Enhances user convenience by streamlining login processes". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange writes "Allows for strict access control, granting access to specific applications at a URL level rather than at the physical IP level". Jamf Connect is most compared with Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, Netskope Private Access, VMware Workspace ONE, Zscaler B2B and Zimperium, whereas Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange is most compared with Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, Cato SASE Cloud Platform, Axis Security, Cloudflare Access and FortiSASE . See our Jamf Connect vs. Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange report.
See our list of best ZTNA as a Service vendors.
We monitor all ZTNA as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.