We performed a comparison between JBoss and Oracle WebLogic Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Server solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."JBoss is a scalable tool."
"The solution's support is very good for repairing components."
"There's good documentation and a pretty good community surrounding the product."
"The greatest benefit of JBoss is that it was procured by IBM, thereby offering exceptional support for our banking operations."
"JBoss has made it very easy to implement web applications."
"The solution is easy to use."
"The product's initial setup phase is easy."
"The high availability is great."
"Oracle WebLogic Server is more secure and has full functionalities that can be used for big applications."
"It is quite robust in comparison to other application servers."
"We have some hosted servers as well as some of our own. It performs well."
"In the newer system, reconfigurability and the fact that it is easy to configure, make it very valuable."
"We can manage every application by creating a managed server and a cluster."
"I recommend the product because the installation is easy, it provides a secure environment, and it's easy to manage. The solution provides easy monitoring. Accessing all the logs is easy, and deploying application versions is smooth."
"WebLogic is reliable, and it's easy to use for development."
"What I like best about Oracle WebLogic Server is its integration with other software."
"It would be great if the product came with a feature where the remarks made on the board can be saved on an individual's laptop to make it more user-friendly."
"The login process could be improved."
"The price of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required. The product could be made cheaper."
"Sometimes the console has a glitch."
"The product could be cheaper."
"JBoss is not as reliable and stable as WebLogic."
"There is not much ability inside of the solution. The world is going beyond different micro and data-type things like Microsoft Office, so we are not seeing much ability within the solution."
"Logging-related issues in JBoss require improvement."
"Oracle's support team fails to understand the real problem of the customer, which is why they take time to resolve issues."
"In the future, I would like to see better support for the REST interface."
"There are always ways to improve. But it's getting better every time, with every new release, and every new patch, it's getting better."
"In terms of what could be improved, maybe something related to the processes automation or starting and stopping the processes, because often WebLogic comes with something called Node Manager. Node Manager needs to be configured and administrated manually."
"The quarterly updates can sometimes lead to instability depending on the configuration of systems."
"The cost could always be lower."
"Licensing fees need improvement."
"Its pricing should be better. We are analyzing other options, such as JBoss, because of the cost of WebLogic."
JBoss is ranked 3rd in Application Server with 24 reviews while Oracle WebLogic Server is ranked 1st in Application Server with 33 reviews. JBoss is rated 8.4, while Oracle WebLogic Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of JBoss writes "A flexible and stable solution that is cost-efficient compared to other products". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle WebLogic Server writes "Offers efficient load distribution with a scope of high scalability ". JBoss is most compared with Tomcat, IBM WebSphere Application Server, IIS, Oracle GlassFish and TmaxSoft JEUS, whereas Oracle WebLogic Server is most compared with Tomcat, Oracle Application Server, Oracle Fusion Middleware, IBM WebSphere Application Server and IIS. See our JBoss vs. Oracle WebLogic Server report.
See our list of best Application Server vendors.
We monitor all Application Server reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.