We performed a comparison between Jitterbit Harmony and webMethods Integration Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is a scalable solution."
"Jitterbit provides the ability to quickly map data between files and databases."
"Jitterbit handles the most lines of data in a .csv and loads the quickest of any data loader I have tried."
"We only use small parts of the solution, however, the parts that we use are quite adequate."
"It is very easy to build integrations and processes to pull and push data."
"The fluid user interface (probably the most user friendly interface, when compared to its competitors)."
"Easy integration with Salesforce"
"It runs like an appliance and has tremendous throughput."
"It's a visual tool, so our transformations can be quickly implemented without a lot of fuss. The fact that we have an easy way to expose REST services is also very interesting. It offers the possibility to connect over GMS to synchronize message brokers."
"The development is very fast. If you know what you're doing, you can develop something very easily and very fast."
"Most of the work in our organization can be more easily done using the tool."
"Segregation of deployment for the environments is the most valuable feature of the solution."
"We can arrange data caching and look at the solid state. Also, the API gateway is a very good component that can handle relevant cachings and integrations, as well as and also load permitting."
"What I like best about webMethods Integration Server is its portfolio of connectors."
"I would say the core Web-based integrations work the best. They are the most efficient and robust implementations one can do with webMethods."
"We have a reusable code that we can replicate for any new interfaces."
"I would like the ability to offer a dedicated cloud version for security."
"Looping through complex data structures can be difficult."
"You need to have some development skills or hire a Jitterbit engineer to make changes."
"Sometimes additional connectors are needed."
"Its API management capabilities need improvement."
"I know with Salesforce updating the UI like they did, it slowed it down a lot."
"The initial setup can be a little bit difficult."
"There were some bugs in the product. For example if you run a delete query and test, it deletes the actual data."
"The initial setup of the webMethods Integration Server is not easy but it gets easier once you know it. It is tiresome but not difficult."
"This product is for larger companies. Compared to TIBCO I think webMethods is better in terms of ease of use and support."
"We need more dashboards and reporting engines that can provide detailed information for management. In short, we need better analytics."
"It could be more user-friendly."
"This solution could be improved by offering subscription based licensing."
"The orchestration is not as good as it should be."
"One area that needs improvement is the version upgrade process. Many customers I've worked with encounter challenges when transitioning from their current version, such as x or 9, to a newer version. The process is not smooth, and they must shift their entire website."
"The price should be reduced to make it more affordable."
More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
Jitterbit Harmony is ranked 18th in Cloud Data Integration with 13 reviews while webMethods Integration Server is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 60 reviews. Jitterbit Harmony is rated 8.6, while webMethods Integration Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Jitterbit Harmony writes "An easy-to-setup solution with good stability ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Event-driven with lots of helpful formats, but minimal learning resources available". Jitterbit Harmony is most compared with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, Azure Data Factory, Mule Anypoint Platform, MuleSoft Composer and SnapLogic, whereas webMethods Integration Server is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, webMethods.io Integration, Mule ESB, TIBCO BusinessWorks and Boomi iPaaS. See our Jitterbit Harmony vs. webMethods Integration Server report.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.