Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Lucid Software Logo
7,535 views|6,771 comparisons
97% willing to recommend
Miro Logo
19,472 views|18,313 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Lucidspark and Miro based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Figma, Miro, Lucid Software and others in Visual Collaboration Platforms.
To learn more, read our detailed Visual Collaboration Platforms Report (Updated: May 2024).
771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"I like the fact that Lucidspark has got all these templates that we can use.""I like the templates that it comes with. I also like how easy it is to change colors and icons and just flip back and forth. It is really easy to maneuver and use.""The ease of using Lucidspark is definitely my favorite. It has been very intuitive, and it is easy for me to drag and drop my ideas to be able to be viewed by my colleagues. It is easily accessible for everyone with whom I'm working.""I really liked the sticky notes. They made it easy to change the colors, just click and add ideas, move those ideas around, and then connect them. I felt like they were very intuitive and easy to use.""It positively affected the productivity of our working and brainstorming sessions. It was definitely a saver for us because we wanted the agenda to be addressed as soon as possible. We were able to do that, and this solution was pretty useful for us.""The solution’s virtual whiteboard for brainstorming is great. It feels like I have an endless board where I can zoom out and draw everybody to what I'm looking at. It's invaluable, especially right now when most people work remotely.""The most valuable feature is the different ways that you can build out the charting and the mind maps. There are various different templates that are included in the program.""The time is no longer spent trying to get everybody to be in one document or sending documents back and forth so that everybody is on the same page. Those things add up, especially as a team gets larger. Also, there are errors that come with that, e.g., sending the wrong version of a document. If the document is held somewhere, then it is easy to determine who made the last correction. Everybody is a part of the team so I can remove people as an administrator who need to be removed or add them to a specific thing. It is very straightforward and worth it in that manner."

More Lucidspark Pros →

"Integrations with so many other tools make this platform highly useful.""The solution's UI is very user-friendly, and it is not that hard to define the shapes you are looking for or to import them.""Online Collaboration made it easy to brainstorm."

More Miro Pros →

Cons
"The user interface is not intuitive because I have used other applications previously, and it took a little bit more time. Once I figured that out how to save shapes, that was super helpful, but it did take probably one or two times to get there. Once I understood it, it made a lot of sense.""There is an emphasis on Google as a set of cloud apps and cloud storage but I don't use Google so that doesn't really help. We're a Microsoft shop so we've got a lot of OneDrive. We have been using Box, which I don't like and which we're moving away from, but my legacy storage asset was Dropbox. Some flexibility there would be worthwhile.""The one other significant recommendation is because I do work with folks outside of my organization quite regularly. The user experience of having them all have to set up a free account to join me in a workspace is a bit cumbersome. I really would love it if there was a Visitor link that would allow contributors who don't have free logins to join and participate.""The challenge that I always face with a tool like this is how to convince other people to start trying it out. I can't say if Lucidspark does a better job than other such tools.""I would like to have a dark mode, but the option is not available.""I found Lucidspark's virtual whiteboard useful, but I still felt there could be more features, like putting up presentations, creating frames, and being able to run it like a presentation. These things would make it better. If they could add more features for presentations and organizing the different sections of the board in a space, which is interlinked to how you can present them efficiently. This would be very helpful.""Sometimes, editing text can be confusing. Changing different fonts and subtitles and the shapes that you're trying to use can be confusing. There isn't that much that I would improve other than just nitpicky user differences.""There should be a feature for changing the color of the background, borders, etc. Such a feature will make the flowcharts more attractive."

More Lucidspark Cons →

"It should have a desktop version.""When I imported an image to Miro, my friend saw it differently from what I saw when I changed the size of it.""Maybe at some point, Miro should be able to use AI to provide analysis from the brainstorming sessions or files fed into it."

More Miro Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "There is room for improvement in terms of the cost. It should all be bundled together. It's becoming like a Microsoft, where you have to buy all the different version features separately. It should just all be bundled with one price."
  • "The licensing is a fair price. We mainly have single users. We chose not to do the team user because of the cost. We didn't see a need for that at this point. We have talked to Lucidchart and Lucidspark salesmen often about that."
  • "It's a very reasonable $8 a month. That makes it really accessible and helps it fill a pretty significant need for virtual collaboration. Just about every leadership team member that I've talked to said, 'Oh, well, that's cheap, just go buy it.'"
  • "It is not cost-prohibitive. It is well worth it, but we are also a small team. We are definitely planning on having it as part of our onboarding for everyone, but I haven't looked at the pricing for an enterprise level or large set of employees."
  • "I personally had a hard time getting the licenses sorted out. In the organizational license, the whole process took a lot of time. Personally, I feel that the licensing could be done much better on that front."
  • "It would be better if I didn't use Lucidspark at all and just used Illustrator and Photoshop, but it doesn't make sense for my projects to do that. It would remove a tremendous amount of steps, but it would cost a tremendous amount of money."
  • "One must pay extra if he wishes to have a higher level product."
  • "I don't think that the cost is ever something that I considered. It has always been worth it to pay a small payment and help everyone with their tasks. It has definitely helped me become more organized. I don't think that the cost has been a barrier at all, and it is worth it to be able to pay for it."
  • More Lucidspark Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Visual Collaboration Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
    771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Hi @Krista Thompson ​ - Yes, LucidSpark is a much more nimble and, in some ways, user-friendly tool than LucidChart. LucidSpark is designed to do a better job managing multiple users participating… more »
    Top Answer:Windows Server integrates well with all Microsoft and many other mainstream solutions Building a Failover Cluster is comparatively much easier in Windows Server than with other solutions. We really… more »
    Top Answer:Integrations with so many other tools make this platform highly useful.
    Top Answer:The solution is super easy to set up.
    Ranking
    Views
    7,535
    Comparisons
    6,771
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    1,237
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    19,472
    Comparisons
    18,313
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    590
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Lucidchart logo
    Compared 69% of the time.
    Figma logo
    Compared 20% of the time.
    MURAL logo
    Compared 2% of the time.
    Jamboard logo
    Compared 1% of the time.
    Figma logo
    Compared 96% of the time.
    Lucidchart logo
    Compared 1% of the time.
    Asana logo
    Compared 1% of the time.
    Bluescape logo
    Compared 1% of the time.
    iObeya logo
    Compared 0% of the time.
    Learn More
    Overview

    Lucidspark is a virtual whiteboard where teams can bring their best ideas to light. Collaborate in real time, no matter where you are. Lucidspark helps people organize notes and scribbles and turn them into presentation-ready concepts. When it’s time for next steps, teams can develop workflows and process documents to turn ideas into reality. Features include: integrations, infinite canvas, sticky notes, freehand drawing, chat, templates, timer, voting, and more.

    With Lucidspark, you can not only brainstorm ideas as a team but then refine and organize those ideas to drive action. Features like assisted grouping and Lucidchart import/export help users turn ideas into plans and strategies.

    Lucidspark is part of the Lucid suite, the only visual collaboration suite that helps teams see and build the future from idea to reality. Users can start ideating in Lucidspark and then seamlessly move to Lucidchart and Lucidchart Cloud Insights to complete the full project lifecycle and make their ideas a reality.

    Miro is a collaborative online whiteboard platform that enables teams to work together remotely, brainstorm ideas, and visualize concepts. With its intuitive interface and extensive range of features, Miro has become a popular tool for remote teams, designers, and educators.

    One of the key features of Miro is its vast library of templates and widgets, which allows users to quickly create various types of visual content such as mind maps, flowcharts, wireframes, and user journey maps. These templates provide a starting point for collaboration and help teams to structure their ideas effectively.

    Miro also offers real-time collaboration, allowing team members to work together on the same board simultaneously. Users can leave comments, mention team members, and have discussions directly on the board, eliminating the need for lengthy email threads or separate communication tools.

    The platform also integrates with popular tools like Slack, Jira, and Google Drive, making it easy to import and export content from other applications. This seamless integration enhances productivity and ensures that teams can work with their preferred tools without any disruptions.

    Furthermore, Miro provides a range of interactive features that enhance collaboration and engagement. Users can add sticky notes, create voting sessions, and conduct remote workshops using Miro's built-in video conferencing capabilities. These features make it easy for teams to brainstorm ideas, gather feedback, and make decisions together, regardless of their physical location.

    In addition to its collaborative features, Miro also prioritizes security and privacy. The platform offers enterprise-grade security measures, including data encryption, access controls, and compliance with industry standards like GDPR and SOC 2. This ensures that sensitive information remains protected and confidential.

    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company15%
    University15%
    Renewables & Environment Company10%
    Media Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Healthcare Company8%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Educational Organization7%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business56%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise31%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise66%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise62%
    Buyer's Guide
    Visual Collaboration Platforms
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Figma, Miro, Lucid Software and others in Visual Collaboration Platforms. Updated: May 2024.
    771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Lucidspark is ranked 4th in Visual Collaboration Platforms with 33 reviews while Miro is ranked 2nd in Visual Collaboration Platforms with 3 reviews. Lucidspark is rated 8.6, while Miro is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Lucidspark writes "Facilitates a lot of the productivity of our working and brainstorming sessions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Miro writes "Easy integrations, in-built templates, and lots of training videos". Lucidspark is most compared with Lucidchart, Figma, MURAL and Jamboard, whereas Miro is most compared with Figma, Lucidchart, Asana, Bluescape and iObeya.

    See our list of best Visual Collaboration Platforms vendors.

    We monitor all Visual Collaboration Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.