We performed a comparison between Lumu and Splunk User Behavior Analytics based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The context provided by the tool is very complete, it includes the miter matrix, playbooks, links, hashes, and much more."
"It's been helpful for overall extended network visibility."
"You can access external links, playbooks, MITRE Matrix, and a lot of information."
"Most of it is automated, so I do not have to watch it to get alerts."
"Lumu protects against threats immediately and handles them in time."
"We are really pleased with Splunk and its features. It would be practically impossible to function without it. To provide a general overview of the system, it's important to note that the standard log files are currently around 250 gigabytes per day. It would be impossible to manually walk through these logs by hand, which is why automation is essential."
"It's easily scalable."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to search through a large amount of data."
"The product is at the forefront of auto-remediation networking. It's great."
"The most valuable features are the indexing and powerful search features."
"It is a solution that helps test and measure customer satisfaction."
"The solution appears to be stable, although we haven't used it heavily."
"The solution's most valuable feature is Splunk queries, which allow us to query the logs and analyze the attack vectors."
"The integration with different vendors and endpoints could be improved."
"I am happy with the current features. However, one important one is to improve the reports."
"It would be good if we could access the physical logs."
"The reports need improvement."
"Nothing so far needs to be improved."
"They should work to add more built-in correlation searches and more use cases based on worldwide customer experiences. They need more ready-made use cases."
"Currently, a lot of network operations need improvement. We still need people to handle incidents. Our vision is to leverage status and convert it directly from the network devices. It would be ideal if we could take action using APIs and API code and remove manual processes."
"The initial setup was complex because some of the configurations that we required needed customization."
"There are occasional bugs."
"The price of Splunk UBA is too high."
"In the future I would like to see simplified statistics and analytical threats."
"The ability to do more complicated data investigation would be a welcome addition for pros, though the functionality now gives most people what they need."
"It would be good if the solution had an analytics tool that allowed us to analyze the data without writing specific queries."
More Splunk User Behavior Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
Lumu is ranked 14th in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) with 5 reviews while Splunk User Behavior Analytics is ranked 13th in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) with 18 reviews. Lumu is rated 9.8, while Splunk User Behavior Analytics is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Lumu writes "Protects against threats and handles it in time with moderate pricing". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk User Behavior Analytics writes "Easy to configure and easy to use solution that integrates with many applications and scripts ". Lumu is most compared with ExtraHop Reveal(x), Darktrace, Stellar Cyber Open XDR, LogRhythm NDR and NextRay NDR, whereas Splunk User Behavior Analytics is most compared with Darktrace, Microsoft Defender for Identity, IBM Security QRadar, Cynet and Exabeam Fusion SIEM. See our Lumu vs. Splunk User Behavior Analytics report.
See our list of best Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) vendors.
We monitor all Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.