We performed a comparison between MEGA HOPEX and QualiWare X based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Architecture Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."An advantage is its accessibility."
"We have many use cases for this solution but the feature I have found most valuable is the IT Portfolio Management module."
"The most valuable feature of MEGA HOPEX is the publication method for static websites. You can generate the whole database into a static website. Additionally, in the new tabular entry, you don't have to put objects or links, you can go and fill a tab and the MEGA HOPEX will generate an object for you in a simple way."
"Every module sets up the same information in a unique repository."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the reuse of common enterprise components and entities."
"We use the portfolio management feature heavily."
"Customer support is fantastic. They are very helpful whenever we get on the line with the support team."
"The main feature I find crucial in MEGA HOPEX is the catalog view, which provides a comprehensive visualization of all artifacts in one repository. Another valuable aspect is the availability of out-of-the-box outcomes, such as strategy maps and BPA models, eliminating the need for additional configuration. MEGA HOPEX allows users to focus on specific business areas, like risk management or data governance, providing a high-level overview while enabling deep dives into specific areas of interest. For risk management, MEGA HOPEX allows users to assess impacts, create recovery plans, and track action plans."
"I like the solution's traceability."
"They do tend to push people to their professional services, instead of helping the customers with their problems. I understand this is their business. At the same time, however, they need to work on fact sheets or offer some program to help the customers who want to implement it themselves and to make it run properly in their environment."
"It has a data domain where we load our data objects onto the tool but doesn't provide data governance capabilities such as cleansing or validating data."
"An area for improvement in MEGA HOPEX is its vast learning curve. The tool is also heavy, so that's a pain point. MEGA HOPEX is also tricky to use if you don't train for many hours."
"It would be great if this solution could integrate with other tools such as ITSM (ServiceNow) or CMDB."
"It takes a long time to learn how to use HOPEX. It's hard to work with it because the user interface is bad. For example, if you want to build a complex system diagram, you need a lot of knowledge to do this correctly and make it readable. In MEGA, you need to create a report and it takes a long time to publish it. The publishing is offline. With RDoC, everything is online."
"Scalability can be a problem sometimes."
"The initial setup can be quite complex at first."
"We would like to see integration with other products, such as being able to use our workflow with SharePoint and Microsoft Office."
"The solution is not easy and intuitive to use. I would also like the software to have a reference metamodel that can guide the modeling."
MEGA HOPEX is ranked 4th in Enterprise Architecture Management with 36 reviews while QualiWare X is ranked 23rd in Enterprise Architecture Management with 3 reviews. MEGA HOPEX is rated 7.8, while QualiWare X is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of MEGA HOPEX writes "Easy to use and robust with good features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of QualiWare X writes "Works as a reference for architecture but not very intuitive ". MEGA HOPEX is most compared with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, LeanIX, ARIS BPA, Visio and Avolution ABACUS, whereas QualiWare X is most compared with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, ARIS Cloud and Avolution ABACUS. See our MEGA HOPEX vs. QualiWare X report.
See our list of best Enterprise Architecture Management vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Architecture Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.