We performed a comparison between Melissa Data Quality and SQL Power Data Quality based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Scrubbing Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."This tool works better for us than using a batch processing system that we do not have enough control over as each record is being processed."
"We like having the ability to write our own utilities/software to process our records and store the final output the way we want."
"It has a straightforward, easy setup."
"Address parsing. Our other software does not have this functionality."
"We are able to more accurately identify valid, and better formatted, data which improves the data we store in our database."
"It gives me an assessed value of the property in question. My partner and I are property investors, and it's good to get an assessed value to cull out properties that we're not interested in."
"We only use the one feature for the NAICS code. This allows our product users to know what industry a business is in."
"Helps our organization provide accurate address information to our customers for direct mailing (household) and other campaigns they want to do."
"The solution is able to integrate with many systems and other products."
"The Nomo, select form, and so on are the most valuable features."
"It is a scalable solution. We have over 1,000 SQL Power Data Quality users in our organization."
"Needs more/better search tools are needed. Also, state and local tax data would be nice."
"One of the problems that we ran into this year was we probably spent over 40 hours finding and trying to drill down to where specific bugs were in the program, which was a tremendous waste of time for us. There were a couple of updates to Windows this year, the program kept crashing. It happened on two different occasions over a period of a few months. Once we told them what the problem was - even though their tech support is great to work with - it literally took probably about two months to fix the issue where we could actually use the program the way we needed to use it."
"We have noticed that some of the emails and addresses return with confusing or incorrect codes, but for the most part, it is accurate."
"It really hasn't given us a phone number for the owner of the property, and that's one thing I'd really like to be getting. Either a phone number or email."
"Many issues, sometimes I have to completely log out and start over."
"It would be nice if it also had a user interface, as it did in years past."
"Address validation and parsing in a few countries have room for improvement."
"To continually update the database with NAICS codes on businesses."
"The normalization factor should be improved so that it is better scaled. It should be more user-friendly."
"Downtime issues should be improved."
"The only area of improvement that we've come across within the solution was the portfolio roadmap creation. There's a bit of limitation there, but otherwise, the tool itself is very good."
Earn 20 points
Melissa Data Quality is ranked 5th in Data Scrubbing Software with 40 reviews while SQL Power Data Quality is ranked 6th in Data Scrubbing Software with 4 reviews. Melissa Data Quality is rated 8.4, while SQL Power Data Quality is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Melissa Data Quality writes "SSIS MatchUp Component is Amazing". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SQL Power Data Quality writes "Is easy to deploy and is stable and scalable". Melissa Data Quality is most compared with Informatica Address Verification, SAP Data Quality Management, Precisely Trillium and Experian Data Quality, whereas SQL Power Data Quality is most compared with Alteryx. See our Melissa Data Quality vs. SQL Power Data Quality report.
See our list of best Data Scrubbing Software vendors.
We monitor all Data Scrubbing Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
