We performed a comparison between Menlo Security Remote Browser Isolation and Skyhigh Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Zscaler, Forcepoint and others in Internet Security."Menlo Security RBI's best feature is its threat isolation engine."
"The solution performs well."
"The product has a very high rating from reviewers. It's a well-respected product."
"They were very, very aggressive in the market to get a new market share or to take over market share while other companies were being broken up."
"Shadow IT reporting capabilities."
"Skyhigh has given us categorization and rating of websites separate from what the web proxy places on the logs."
"The feature I found most valuable is the API."
"The most valuable features of MVISION Cloud are the automatic reports and modification incidents."
"I personally don't have any issues with the performance or the stability of the solution."
"Menlo Security RBI could be more cloud-friendly, and its mobility could be improved."
"One area for improvement I've seen in Skyhigh Security is that it lacks support for unsanctioned applications, where customers have their applications. Those applications do not come from Microsoft or other popular vendors. For example, Microsoft has support for Teams and it has support for OneDrive, but it doesn't have support for custom applications built by customers. Customers have internal teams building and publishing applications to the external world, but Skyhigh Security doesn't have support for those applications, and this is the main problem I've seen. The solution only supports a pool of applications that are from Microsoft and other major SaaS vendors. McAfee doesn't provide support for custom applications, compared to other vendors who provide it. For example, Bitglass and Netskope both have support for custom applications. Another area for improvement in Skyhigh Security is that its API support is a little weak. I also have not seen a strong integration between the solution and other McAfee products."
"Skyhigh Security, as a product, is excellent, but in terms of the right services and support, those are lagging very much, for example, in Trellix. From one hundred, its score has gone down to ten, so ten out of one hundred, otherwise, it's the number one product."
"The services take some time to load. It would be helpful if the loading time was reduced."
"There isn't really any aspect that is lacking."
"The pricing of the solution could be adjusted to make it more reasonable."
"It is an expensive solution."
"You have to have some kind of background with cloud-based security, like working with different providers and how to make instances in the clouds and that kind of stuff - including cloud, networking cloud, cloud application development, anything like that is a requirement to be in the CASB space."
"McAfee needs to add more products that could be managed from the cloud."
More Menlo Security Remote Browser Isolation Pricing and Cost Advice →
Menlo Security Remote Browser Isolation is ranked 7th in Internet Security with 1 review while Skyhigh Security is ranked 12th in Secure Web Gateways (SWG) with 51 reviews. Menlo Security Remote Browser Isolation is rated 8.0, while Skyhigh Security is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Menlo Security Remote Browser Isolation writes "Stable and scalable solution with a great threat isolation engine". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Skyhigh Security writes "Good scalability, but the technical support service needs improvement". Menlo Security Remote Browser Isolation is most compared with Zscaler Internet Access, Cloudflare Access, Cisco Umbrella, Perimeter 81 and Akamai Enterprise Application Access, whereas Skyhigh Security is most compared with Zscaler Internet Access, Netskope , Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps, Symantec Proxy and Forcepoint CASB.
We monitor all Internet Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.