We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure and Pantheon based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two PaaS Clouds solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is a stable solution because it depends on the workload you expect. Based on that data, you can configure how many users it can handle."
"Microsoft has a lot of partners in this area, and they have a lot of information available online, so it's easy to get support."
"The system is more secure, and this is valuable."
"The Azure Portal has an advantage in terms of UX making buying resources or downgrading is really easier to understand. AWS has micro, smaller functionalities whereas Azure has more end-to-end focus which makes it easier saving you time and money."
"It's stable, easy to use, reliable, and cheap."
"The product makes it easy to spin up new environments and develop new technologies."
"One of the features I have found to be valuable is the scale set feature."
"There are a lot of things that we like about it. It is very easy to provision and configure. It is flexible and scalable."
"The product allows users to create multiple development environments."
"Pantheon has the most valuable workflow model."
"Microsoft Azure needs to improve its user interface. New developers and teams have difficulty understanding its lifecycle."
"The quality of some components of Microsoft Azure is not that great. For example, Microsoft has not fixed issues in Microsoft Teams for many years. There are well-known issues that are submitted by customers two years ago and they still are not fixed."
"Microsoft should have one package for all their solutions in one place to be found."
"Sometimes performance takes a hit on a slow network."
"We had issues with the Mobile Service ORM and the Azure SQL Database (cloud version of SQL Server). At times, the queries that are created automatically from the ORM mapping are not very well optimized for this database and that can lead to performance and stability issues. On occasion, the connection manager from the ORM does not handle the database connections very well."
"Talking from a networking perspective, when you create a file or a rule in Azure and you want to view this IP group, sometimes the way it is displayed on the GUI, you don't see the name of the group."
"The solution could improve by providing better tutorials and documentation."
"There are a number of services offered by AWS that are not yet available on Azure."
"The Multidev environment is very costly compared to other tools like AWS and GCP."
"Pantheon has the most valuable workflow model."
Microsoft Azure is ranked 1st in PaaS Clouds with 299 reviews while Pantheon is ranked 20th in PaaS Clouds with 2 reviews. Microsoft Azure is rated 8.4, while Pantheon is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure writes "Promotes clear, logical structures preventing impractical configurations and offers seamless integration ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pantheon writes "The product is user-friendly and performs well, but it is very costly compared to other tools". Microsoft Azure is most compared with Google Firebase, Amazon AWS, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), Pivotal Cloud Foundry and SAP Cloud Platform, whereas Pantheon is most compared with Amazon AWS, Acquia Cloud, SAP Cloud Platform, GoDaddy and Cloudways. See our Microsoft Azure vs. Pantheon report.
See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.
We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
