We compared SailPoint IdentityIQ and Microsoft Identity Manager based on our user's reviews in several parameters.
SailPoint IdentityIQ is praised for its efficient access management, user provisioning, and role management capabilities, along with seamless integration and robust reporting options. On the other hand, Microsoft Identity Manager is highly praised for its strong integration with Microsoft products, robust authentication, scalability, and comprehensive auditing features. SailPoint offers reasonable pricing and great customer support, while Microsoft emphasizes flexibility in customization and integration but may have higher setup costs. SailPoint is commended for delivering a substantial ROI, while Microsoft's functionality and ease of use in identity management processes are notable. Both products could benefit from enhancements in user interface and customization options.
Features: SailPoint IdentityIQ is praised for its comprehensive access management, efficient user provisioning, robust role management, customizable dashboards and reporting, and seamless integration. Microsoft Identity Manager excels in integrating with Microsoft products, offering robust authentication and authorization, and providing a user-friendly interface for simplified identity management. Additionally, users value the flexibility, scalability, and comprehensive auditing and reporting features of Microsoft Identity Manager.
Pricing and ROI: The setup cost for SailPoint IdentityIQ is considered manageable and not overly burdensome according to user feedback. In contrast, users have varied experiences with the setup cost of Microsoft Identity Manager, with some finding it high, especially with additional support or consultancy services required., SailPoint IdentityIQ delivers increased operational efficiency, improved user access management, and enhanced security. Microsoft Identity Manager automates identity management processes, streamlining workflows and reducing risks of unauthorized access.
Room for Improvement: The room for improvement in SailPoint IdentityIQ includes enhancements to the user interface and customization options, with users noting the complexity of the interface and the need for more flexibility in customizing the software. On the other hand, Microsoft Identity Manager would benefit from improvements in the user interface, navigation, integration with platforms and applications, and customization options.
Deployment and customer support: User feedback on the duration to establish a new tech solution with SailPoint IdentityIQ varies, with some users mentioning three months for deployment and an additional week for setup. In contrast, Microsoft Identity Manager users also mention three months for deployment but consider setup as part of the same timeframe., SailPoint IdentityIQ receives positive feedback for customer service, with responsive and helpful support staff. Users appreciate their professionalism and promptness. Microsoft Identity Manager is also praised for helpfulness, efficiency, and knowledgeable assistance.
The summary above is based on 35 interviews we conducted recently with SailPoint IdentityIQ and Microsoft Identity Manager users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"I'm not using Omada, but the interface is easy to use and gives you a solid overview of your identities."
"The most valuable feature in Omada is the governance. We work with other products and other product vendors, but the sweet spot in the market for Omada is where things are heavy on governance."
"The most valuable aspect of the product is that it is Microsoft-based and it supports all Microsoft technology."
"It has a lot of out-of-the-box features. It is flexible, and there are a lot of possibilities to configure and extend it. It is user-friendly. It has an interface that is end-user or business-user friendly."
"We used to have a problem where an employee's access wasn't terminated when they left the company. Now, we have much better visibility into and control over who has access."
"Omada's onboarding features reflect our processes for onboarding new employees well. That is the primary reason we use this solution. We use role-based access control. I'm not sure how much it has improved our security posture, but it's made managing identities more convenient."
"Its best feature is definitely the process design. It is quite easy and straightforward to design a process."
"The most valuable aspects of Omada Identity for me are the automation capabilities."
"What makes this solution attractive is the licensing model. Microsoft Identity Manager is included in premium versions of Azure AD and in enterprise agreements such as E3. This makes the solution very attractive to many of our clients who are subscribed to those products."
"The feature that I find most valuable is the security layer of the identity and access management solution. The ability to secure on-premises and cloud-based workloads and to provide seamless authentication into hybrid workloads, which is also both on-premises and in cloud environments."
"The features that we find most valuable are security, mobility, and Single Sign-On."
"The product’s simplicity and integration are valuable."
"It is a stable product. You will experience some issues with it, but it's a good product."
"The product’s most valuable feature is stability."
"The product allows us to track the logins easily."
"The concept is primarily for the people in the business. In business, you can discuss how integrating all the services and resources within the company can bring numerous benefits."
"Security and administration for any new/current access."
"The most selling modules for SailPoint are the compliance manager and the life cycle manager."
"The initial setup isn't so difficult."
"It is simple and easy to implement."
"Deployment takes a bit of time, however, once it's done properly, everything becomes very organized and easy to use."
"One of the most valuable aspects of SailPoint is its open integration interface."
"The first valuable feature of the solution is its interface. The second feature of the solution is the level of flexibility it provides."
"It is a stable tool, which we run in our complex environment."
"Its flexibility is both a good thing and a bad thing. Because it is very flexible, it also becomes too complex. This is common for most of the products we evaluated. Its scalability should be better. It had a few scalability issues."
"The current reporting tools in Omada are limited, but we expect significant improvements in the new version."
"I would like to see them expand the functionality of the tool to continue to be competitive with the monsters out there. For example, they could add functionality on the authentication side, functionality that Octa and SailPoint have. But they should do that while maintaining the same simplicity that makes Omada a product of choice today."
"Omada could communicate better with us about the product roadmap. We haven't gotten any updates about it. The user interface is often a bit difficult to understand. It isn't optimized for small screens, so it doesn't display all of the information clearly, so users need to scroll a lot."
"Omada could make it a bit more convenient to send emails based on events automatically. Having that functionality is critical for us to maintain transparency."
"Omada Identity has a steep learning curve."
"If I had to name one thing, it would be the user interface (UI)."
"When the re-certification process is launched that makes Omada very slow. There are performance issues in the current version."
"The prices can always be improved, and the integration with the software from other vendors could use an improvement, especially if you are using something like Oracle for a database, SAP for ERP, or something like that."
"In terms of the identity and access management solution for on-premises environment, I think Microsoft needs to eliminate or minimize the number of workloads for the solution to run in on-premises environment."
"The information that is available for the Active Directory portal is segregated here and there."
"It would be good if Microsoft Identity Manager Maybe could be integrated with Azure Active Directory directly and made as a cloud platform."
"It requires a lot of improvements. Microsoft is killing this product and migrating some of the features to Azure AD. The last version of this solution was 2016. If it is going to stay and integrate with Azure AD, its integration needs to be worked on in terms of connectors, etc. It doesn't seem that they are improving it alone. Microsoft wants to integrate it with Azure AD, but the integration is still not complete."
"The governance reporting of the solution can be improved, as it can be difficult to get good, intelligible reports. Microsoft could implement an API of some sort to allow report customization or some form of SQL model, to further customize modules and improve the reporting. That would be a major improvement to the product."
"Microsoft Identity Manager could be more intuitive in terms of interface."
"Some valuable features might go unused because they are not well-documented or connected clearly in user guides."
"Some setups should be done in the interface and in the code, and could be made simpler."
"It is not readily available and cannot be downloaded from the net."
"The user interface could be slightly improved. It could be made simpler and more user-friendly, however, it is good enough right now."
"We faced some issues while integrating the solution with a third-party tool."
"It is too technical. You need really good technical skills in Java and other technologies, which are hard to find. If they can make it easier so that things can be done with a few clicks, it will be great."
"The connectors should be improved."
"The interface should be simple and easier to use."
"I think that the onboarding framework could be improved."
More SailPoint Identity Security Cloud Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Identity Manager is ranked 8th in Identity Management (IM) with 18 reviews while SailPoint Identity Security Cloud is ranked 2nd in Identity Management (IM) with 62 reviews. Microsoft Identity Manager is rated 7.8, while SailPoint Identity Security Cloud is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Microsoft Identity Manager writes "Constantly evolving while being a crucial feature for today's security needs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SailPoint Identity Security Cloud writes "Flexible, easy to customize, and not too difficult to set up". Microsoft Identity Manager is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Saviynt, Microsoft Entra Permissions Management, NetIQ Identity Manager and ForgeRock, whereas SailPoint Identity Security Cloud is most compared with Saviynt, One Identity Manager, Microsoft Entra ID, ForgeRock and SAP Identity Management. See our Microsoft Identity Manager vs. SailPoint Identity Security Cloud report.
See our list of best Identity Management (IM) vendors.
We monitor all Identity Management (IM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
