We performed a comparison between Microsoft .NET Framework and Windows Process Activation Services based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure."It facilitated the streamlined scheduling process by amalgamating inputs from various sources, including location data and other systems."
"Microsoft .NET Framework reduces the cost of entry and enables the development of applications with mature and enterprise features, thereby lowering the entry barriers."
"It is a stable solution."
"I like that ASP.NET is used for the framework and the core web services."
"The product has a good interface and easy-to-use programming language."
"User-friendly and straightforward."
"The most valuable feature is customization."
"When we talk about .NET development, we use Visual Studio IDE to create these things. In recent years, there have been a lot of improvements in Visual Studio 2022. It would be a daunting task to list all of the features that have benefited us, as it would require a lot of time and effort. However, there are definitely many improvements year after year in .NET development."
"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the central console, that allows you to see all of the activated and deactivated computers."
"In the realm of Microsoft .NET Framework, particularly in the C# language, there have been significant developments that I find highly commendable. I am genuinely fascinated by the continuous evolution of the language, and staying abreast of the latest features in Azure is both challenging and enjoyable. Working with C# in Azure is particularly fantastic. I appreciate in .NET, as compared to Java, is the enforcement of types, providing a better experience in terms of technicalities. Additionally, the introduction of Roslyn in the past few years has brought about the concept of late .NET, which I find interesting and powerful. This allows for the transformation of symbolic code just before execution, eliminating the runtime decision-making process and enhancing efficiency. However, late .NET does come with a drawback – a delay in the last-minute computation when starting an executable. While some may find this less appealing in terms of instant responsiveness, especially in serverless cloud environments, the efficiency gained from executing strictly binary code is valuable. Despite potential drawbacks like the time required for activation, I view .NET favorably for its technical advancements and efficiency, especially in scenarios such as serverless cloud computing. It's essential to recognize the intricacies of how .NET processes code and the efficiency it brings, which some may overlook."
"You need to have the technical expertise to use this product."
"They should try to improve their Blazor WebAssembly."
"The initial setup is complex."
"Lacking in auto-scaling."
"The product is nearing its sunset, and we think that by 2028, we won't get support anymore"
"Microsoft .NET Framework has a steep learning curve, which could be improved."
"They should have more training materials available that are specific to .NET. We spend a lot of money training our engineers."
"The stability of the solution needs improvement."
Earn 20 points
Microsoft .NET Framework is ranked 4th in Application Infrastructure with 47 reviews while Windows Process Activation Services is ranked 23rd in Application Infrastructure. Microsoft .NET Framework is rated 8.4, while Windows Process Activation Services is rated 4.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft .NET Framework writes "Intuitive, easier to develop, maintain, and migrate from the old framework to newer versions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Windows Process Activation Services writes "Central console enables us to see all of the activated and deactivated computers but it has poor alerts and frustrating technical support". Microsoft .NET Framework is most compared with IIS, Magic xpa Application Platform, JBoss Enterprise Application Platform, Apache Web Server and WebLogic Suite, whereas Windows Process Activation Services is most compared with IIS.
See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.