Microsoft Teams vs SharePoint comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Microsoft Logo
273 views|107 comparisons
94% willing to recommend
Microsoft Logo
7,520 views|6,143 comparisons
77% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Microsoft Teams and SharePoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Virtual Meetings solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Teams vs. SharePoint Report (Updated: January 2023).
772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The initial setup was okay.""The most valuable feature of the solution is that it can be included in most systems...Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.""I am impressed with the tool's integration with SharePoint where we can access it with a single click from the platform. The solution is available in web and mobile versions so it gives a seamless experience when we move from one device to another. Especially when you're on the calls, you don't need to get out of one device, and then log in to another, and then join that meeting. You need to just switch.""The feature I like most in Microsoft Teams is the ability to work on the same file with other people, for example, on Microsoft PowerPoint, or Microsoft Excel, without needing to share the file via email.""The solution has calendars that help us to manage work.""The most valuable feature of Microsoft Teams for us is the ability to share files from OneDrive seamlessly.""The mobile app really enabled us to connect meetings on the go from anywhere.""It is a stable solution."

More Microsoft Teams Pros →

"SharePoint enabled the staff to share documents and work on a document simultaneously.""The ability to take Excel files and make them dynamic SharePoint lists with instant reporting capabilities has been a major benefit.""The security feature is valuable.""It has good integration with other MS products.""The most valuable feature is the ability to easily build intranet sites for communicating within teams, storing documentation, product information, pricing policies, updates on product infrastructure, and other related news.""It is well supported by Microsoft.""Document flows, storage, and numbering take off the actions for checking and assigning the numbering and running around with approvals and pre-approvals.""The ability to quickly and easily create team sites has been great."

More SharePoint Pros →

Cons
"In the next release, I would like to have the interface modernized and brought more up to date.""Microsoft Teams has a limitation on the number of people, which could be increased.""There can be more customization and also the task management tools needs better tools for integration.""The user interface is slightly weak in Microsoft Teams and could be improved.""I think they can improve the all those segments for channel bulking. Also, some functionalities which migrated from Skype for Business to Teams, is not supported by Teams. We had used them in Skype for Business.""The solution’s stability could be improved.""I'd like Microsoft to start adding more AI functionality into Teams.""The product should improve its security aspect, scalability, stability, and screen recording. It would be nice if Teams could come up with a feature where I can write chats and send them as mail. It would be also good if Teams could be connected to our application software so that for any doubts that can occur during the training, the operator can resolve them through chats. Hence, they can easily guide and close the issue."

More Microsoft Teams Cons →

"​The support is the worst. It is bad when Microsoft support does not even know what to do and you have to tell them. Also, they take too long to solve a problem.​""Flexibility and extensibility, above everything, could be improved.""Replication needs improvement.""The initial setup was very complex.""The company also needs to make sure that their policies are dictating how information is stored and used, instead of letting SharePoint take control.""This solution would benefit from the implementation of enhanced online forms and template development capabilities.""There are some limitations on storage.""The solution lacks collaboration features."

More SharePoint Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Pricing is free to a threshold and then after that you have to license per user."
  • "It is the standard license which is part of many Office packets."
  • "We are satisfied with the price of this solution."
  • "If you have content that requires more security and you want to use it in a more secure manner, with more protection, then it will come at a higher cost."
  • "If you have clients who do not have a computer and are joining with their phones it's an additional fee of $5.00 per user."
  • "The pricing for Teams is very competitive."
  • "My understanding is that there are licensing fees, but I'm not sure how much they might be."
  • "It is affordable because it also includes the licenses on Microsoft Word, Microsoft Office and SharePoint."
  • More Microsoft Teams Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "As usual, Microsoft’s licensing structures don’t really seem to fit the needs of their products. This leads to always paying for a project you will never use fully or always be adding to."
  • "Licensing can be by server or by seat."
  • "It is very expensive.​"
  • "The data classification and search elements are cheap."
  • "The replacement costs for it are cheaper if you use only SharePoint."
  • "We have purchased add-ons to handle multiple site collections, form creation, and design."
  • "The cost is expensive, but worthwhile."
  • "The pricing works for us."
  • More SharePoint Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Virtual Meetings solutions are best for your needs.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparison Review
    Anonymous User
    At Mediacurrent we often get requests to compare Drupal to other platforms used for intranet sites and social business platforms (like https://dev.twitter.com/ for example). This is often referred to as “Social Business Software”, which has grown in popularity in recent years. I decided to do a round-up of a couple of the more well known platforms and compare their products to Drupal. In this roundup we will be comparing Jive, Sharepoint and Drupal Commons. Drupal Commons is a popular distribution created by Acquia to compete with some of these other proprietary platforms. There are many other options out there, commercial and otherwise, to compare with Drupal but I want to focus on Jive and Sharepoint for a couple of reasons. I chose Jive because it is one of the leading competitors in this space in respect to market share. Next, I chose Sharepoint because I have some history with Sharepoint. This experience dates back to when I built www.adhe.edu with Sharepoint 2007 a few years ago. I subsequently wrote this blog entry about my experience shortly after joining Mediacurrent. This roundup will also act as a refresher for those who read my original “Drupal vs. Sharepoint” blog. Yammer, which was recently bought by Microsoft and is the tool we currently use for office communication will also get some mentions throughout this article. As I went through and tested each of these tools I used three main criteria in my evaluation Cost Ability to Customize Overall features… Read more →
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of Microsoft Teams for us is the ability to share files from OneDrive seamlessly.
    Top Answer:For setup costs, pricing, and licensing, I advise considering the flexibility offered by site licenses. However, it's important to be aware of potential fluctuations in pricing, as they can vary… more »
    Top Answer:One area where the product could be improved is its operational memory utilization. Currently, Microsoft Teams consumes a significant amount of memory when in use, which can pose challenges for users… more »
    Top Answer:Alfresco scores are high on all features of an ECM solution and tools.   Back office processing, rated as 3.36 good.  Business Process Application 3.55 Good to excellent.  Document Management 4.12… more »
    Top Answer:The pricing is competitive. That's why almost all the companies are using SharePoint. I rate the pricing a ten out of ten. When we buy the license, the person buying must be well-educated on how the… more »
    Ranking
    5th
    out of 62 in Virtual Meetings
    Views
    273
    Comparisons
    107
    Reviews
    98
    Average Words per Review
    324
    Rating
    8.4
    Views
    7,520
    Comparisons
    6,143
    Reviews
    18
    Average Words per Review
    457
    Rating
    8.1
    Comparisons
    Citrix ShareFile logo
    Compared 12% of the time.
    Microsoft OneDrive logo
    Compared 8% of the time.
    Dropbox logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    WordPress logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Objective ECM logo
    Compared 3% of the time.
    Also Known As
    MS Teams
    SharePoint 2007, SharePoint 2010
    Learn More
    Overview

    At Microsoft, our mission is to empower every person and every organization on the planet to achieve more. Our mission is grounded in both the world in which we live and the future we strive to create. Today, we live in a mobile-first, cloud-first world, and the transformation we are driving across our businesses is designed to enable Microsoft and our customers to thrive in this world.

    We do business in 170 countries and are made up of 114,000 passionate employees dedicated to fulfilling our mission of helping you and your organization achieve more.

    SharePoint is a Microsoft-based platform for building web applications. It covers a widerange of capabilities and while it is appropriate for experienced webdevelopers, even non-technical minded users can easily navigate through thesystem and execute functions such as collaborating data, managing documents andfiles, creating websites, managing social networking solutions, and automatingworkflow.

    Major areas that SharePoint deals with are websites,communities, content, search, insights, and composites. The purpose is to give usersthe ability to create or develop these key business components on their owneven without technical knowledge of, for example, how to build a website or howto integrate coding. Configuring SharePoint into a business's system is meantto cut out all of the complicated steps, and pave the way for easierimplementation all around.

    Sample Customers
    Honeywll, AIRFRANCE, AccuWeather, Lilly
    Toyota, Aeroports de Paris, ASBBank Ltd., Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals, CambridgeshireConstabulary, D&M Group, NPL Construction Company, and The Regional Municipality of Niagara.
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Manufacturing Company15%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization62%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Government4%
    Computer Software Company4%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Energy/Utilities Company8%
    University8%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Government12%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business34%
    Midsize Enterprise27%
    Large Enterprise39%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business7%
    Midsize Enterprise64%
    Large Enterprise29%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business41%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise39%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise60%
    Buyer's Guide
    Microsoft Teams vs. SharePoint
    January 2023
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Teams vs. SharePoint and other solutions. Updated: January 2023.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Microsoft Teams is ranked 5th in Virtual Meetings with 145 reviews while SharePoint is ranked 1st in Enterprise Content Management with 150 reviews. Microsoft Teams is rated 8.2, while SharePoint is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Microsoft Teams writes "Great for project planning and monitoring with easy communication capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SharePoint writes "Good integrations, helps with collaboration, and increases visibility". Microsoft Teams is most compared with Atlassian Confluence, Symphony, Loom, Chatter and Huddle, whereas SharePoint is most compared with Citrix ShareFile, Microsoft OneDrive, Dropbox, WordPress and Objective ECM. See our Microsoft Teams vs. SharePoint report.

    We monitor all Virtual Meetings reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.