We performed a comparison between N-able EDR and Trend Vision One based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, SentinelOne, CrowdStrike and others in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)."It is stable and scalable."
"Impressive detection capabilities"
"The ease of deployment and configuration is valuable. It's very easy compared to other vendors like Sophos. Sophos' configuration is complex. Fortinet is a lot easier to understand. You don't need a lot of admin knowledge to do the configuration."
"The price is low and quite competitive with others."
"The product's initial setup phase is very easy."
"We have FortiEDR installed on all our systems. This protects them from any threats."
"Additionally, when it comes to EDR, there are more tools available to assist with client work."
"This is stable and scalable."
"The most valuable features are the rollback feature, it's important for us. The AI models and are good."
"I like Vision One's workbench. It provides helpful logs that I can search, and the telemetry is excellent because I can see what's happening during an attack or potential attack."
"It has the feature to track an attack back. If there is an incident or an attack occurs, you can get a bird's eye view of that attack. You can see how the attackers came in and how they managed the attack. You can trace an attack. If you are giving a presentation to the management, you can easily show it to them in a live environment how the attackers came, which is amazing."
"We haven't had any issues with configurations or customizations."
"I like the workbench. It is a view of all the alerts or problems in your estate. The visibility that it provides to engineers is very useful. It is one thing having lots of alerts. It is another thing to have something to correlate all your alerts into a workbench for you so that you can see what is going on."
"I'm satisfied with the level of coverage. The policies have been very useful and detailed."
"The proactive approach is the best feature."
"The search features help us try to correlate information and identify any suspicious activity."
"The automatic EDR system that notifies us when something is wrong is valuable."
"Cannot be used on mobile devices with a secure connection."
"The only minor concern is occasional interference with desired programs."
"We've had a lot of false positives; things incorrectly flagged that require manual configuration to allow. Even worse, after we allow a legitimate program, it sometimes gets flagged again after an update. This has caused a lot of extra work for my team."
"Integration with Azure and SaaS provisioning tools could improve Fortinet FortiEDR."
"The support needs improvement."
"They can include the automation for the realtime updates. We have a network infrastructure with remote sites. Whenever they send updates, they are not automated. We have to go into the console and push those updates. I wish it was more automated. The update file is currently around 31 MB. It could be smaller."
"I think cloud security and SASE are areas of concern in the product where improvements are required. The tool's cloud version has to be improved in terms of the security it offers."
"The SIEM could be improved."
"We have a lot of false positives we see in the dashboard. I think this is the only problem we are facing."
"We do use the automation capability a little. However, we noticed some limitations, especially on the playbook side."
"It would be better if it were more user-friendly. It would also be better if the implementation were more straightforward."
"We've received some mild complaints that the documentation is sometimes not up to date."
"We'd like to see a few more integrations."
"They are planning on adding the Security Playbooks as a complete feature. In the preview mode, it is available; however, it is not released."
"The support has been delayed at times."
"The solution lacks compatibility with other products. It needs to integrate better with other surrounding solutions."
"The solution only supports Windows and Mac. It would be helpful if it could support other OS, such as Linux."
Earn 20 points
N-able EDR is ranked 57th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) while Trend Vision One is ranked 5th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 43 reviews. N-able EDR is rated 0.0, while Trend Vision One is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of N-able EDR writes "Stable, effective rollback feature, and useful AI models". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Vision One writes "The integration of toolsets is key, enabling automation, and vendor has been tremendous partner for us". N-able EDR is most compared with SentinelOne Singularity Complete, CrowdStrike Falcon, ESET Inspect, Check Point Harmony Endpoint and Cisco Secure Endpoint, whereas Trend Vision One is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, Trend Vision One Endpoint Security, Microsoft Defender XDR, SentinelOne Singularity Complete and Wazuh.
See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors and best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.