NetBrain vs OpenText Network Automation comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
NetBrain Logo
1,376 views|878 comparisons
75% willing to recommend
OpenText Logo
462 views|317 comparisons
75% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between NetBrain and OpenText Network Automation based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Network Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed NetBrain vs. OpenText Network Automation Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"NetBrain is a very simple tool.""Enables maps to be drawn out.""A reliable, time-saving tool for providing accurate layer 2 and layer 3 network mappings.""This product has good network monitoring and troubleshooting capabilities.""Chain management is a good feature. I don't get it on other solutions."

More NetBrain Pros →

"Pushing the network configuration to bulk devices. This saves a considerable amount of time that the engineer spends in pushing the network configuration.""When compared with SolarWinds, it is more user-friendly, and tasks can be completed more quickly."

More OpenText Network Automation Pros →

Cons
"It would be nice if the setup was a little simpler. Also, if the solution could provide more training materials for new people coming into our company so they can quickly learn how to use the functionalities.""The IP interface brief isn't consistent.""Each device needs to be configured to allow NetBrain to poll for the information it needs, which can be very time-consuming for a large network.""Support needs to improve for the installed product and some of the reporting could be more flexible to provide more complete cataloging.""The solution could integrate more automation."

More NetBrain Cons →

"Compatibility of the devices needs to be enhanced, as it seems to be limited.""Level one administration task can be defined in Micro Focus Network Automation but it could be more simplified."

More OpenText Network Automation Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The product is expensive, but less expensive than some of the competition and worth the price."
  • "Licensing is based on a per-device basis, which means that it can get very expensive if you have a large number of devices."
  • More NetBrain Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Pricing is reasonable, but if you compare it with other network Operation Management tools that are available on the market, it's expensive."
  • More OpenText Network Automation Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Ranking
    5th
    out of 22 in Network Automation
    Views
    1,376
    Comparisons
    878
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    11th
    out of 22 in Network Automation
    Views
    462
    Comparisons
    317
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    NetBrain vs. OpenText Network Automation
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about NetBrain vs. OpenText Network Automation and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Micro Focus Network Automation, HPE Network Automation
    Learn More
    Overview

    Managing today’s networks with yesterday’s manual processes is no longer a viable solution. NetBrain’s network automation platform provides actionable insights into your network to help you make better and faster decisions - particularly when you’re troubleshooting, securing, and making changes to the network.

    OpenText Network Automation helps IT organizations drive efficiencies by automating time-consuming manual compliance and network configuration tasks for the complete operational lifecycle of network devices from provisioning to policy-based network configuration management, compliance policy enforcement and reporting, and security administration. OpenText Network Automation also helps increase network stability and uptime by preventing inconsistencies and misconfigurations often created by manual processes.  When combined with OpenText Network Node Manager i, it delivers a unique integrated solution that delivers network fault, availability, and performance integrated with change, network configuration, compliance, and automated diagnostics that operates from a shared network topology database.

    Sample Customers
    CompuCon, TD Ameritrade, Move Inc.
    Tech Mahindra, Avea, China Merchants Bank, NNIT, Distinctive Software Solutions, Virgin Media, NEC Australia, Osiatis, Hostworks, Retegal, Allianz Shared Infrastructure Services SE (ASIC), State of Kansas Division of Information Services and Communications (DISC)
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Government11%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Government14%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Healthcare Company8%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise70%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise72%
    Buyer's Guide
    NetBrain vs. OpenText Network Automation
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about NetBrain vs. OpenText Network Automation and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    NetBrain is ranked 5th in Network Automation while OpenText Network Automation is ranked 11th in Network Automation. NetBrain is rated 7.2, while OpenText Network Automation is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of NetBrain writes "Good monitoring and troubleshoot capabilities, improves overall network traffic visibility". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Network Automation writes "Helps the configuration backup be validated before and after any change in the network infrastructure". NetBrain is most compared with Cisco DNA Center, ThousandEyes, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, SolarWinds Network Automation Manager and Forward Enterprise, whereas OpenText Network Automation is most compared with Cisco DNA Center, SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager and BackBox. See our NetBrain vs. OpenText Network Automation report.

    See our list of best Network Automation vendors.

    We monitor all Network Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.