We performed a comparison between Nutanix AHV Virtualization and Odin Virtuozzo Containers based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Proxmox, VMware, Microsoft and others in Server Virtualization Software."This solution is very stable and it has been running for the last three months, with no issues."
"Using AHV, we have a built-in VR solution. It operates using a reduplication-based unique package transfer process."
"The most valuable feature is the integration between storage and compute services."
"It has a vs switch for the people who know Linux, in case it's easier for them to use AHV than it is to use VMware."
"We use Prism Central, the centralized management console for AHV clusters. It allows administrators to manage multiple clusters from a single interface and provides a unified view of the entire infrastructure."
"Nutanix AHV is very scalable. It can go to unlimited nodes."
"Nutanix AHV works really well. It's much easier to administer and manage than VMware. Since we're not a large IT department within the finance sector, our team is relatively small. We don't have a huge team of IT professionals to manage all the other systems."
"Nutanix is good for new implementations on the VM side. It's very good for disaster recovery and final storage."
"When you run templates on the containers on Virtuozzo they have a lot of back-ups."
"Honestly, there's a lot to work on the product, especially for someone like me who has worked on VMware. VMware offers a significant level of customization when configuring virtual machines, and that level of detail is not as pronounced on Nutanix AHV Virtualization."
"The solution is very expensive."
"Lacks integration with the cloud or other solutions."
"There is room for improvement in the USB mapping."
"The software based controller has high consumption. This could be improved."
"The price of Nutanix AHV Virtualization could improve."
"It worked well in the beginning but after using it for some time, we found some limitations in terms of compatibility with other software."
"The technical support for this solution needs to be improved in terms of response time."
"Odin Virtuozzo has poor support and needs to improve."
Nutanix AHV Virtualization is ranked 6th in Server Virtualization Software with 48 reviews while Odin Virtuozzo Containers is ranked 12th in Server Virtualization Software with 2 reviews. Nutanix AHV Virtualization is rated 8.6, while Odin Virtuozzo Containers is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of Nutanix AHV Virtualization writes "Lightweight, integrates well, and the technical support is responsive". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Odin Virtuozzo Containers writes "Significant backup for containers, but the customer service is terrible". Nutanix AHV Virtualization is most compared with Proxmox VE, Hyper-V, VMware vSphere, KVM and Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI), whereas Odin Virtuozzo Containers is most compared with Proxmox VE, Hyper-V, KVM and VMware vSphere.
See our list of best Server Virtualization Software vendors.
We monitor all Server Virtualization Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
