We performed a comparison between Nutanix AHV Virtualization and Oracle VM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Server Virtualization Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is stable."
"Nutanix AHV is very scalable. It can go to unlimited nodes."
"The most valuable aspect of this solution is that you don't need to pay for it, it's free, as opposed to paying for a VMware license."
"This solution is very stable and it has been running for the last three months, with no issues."
"The storage features and volume system are great."
"Nutanix is good for new implementations on the VM side. It's very good for disaster recovery and final storage."
"The most valuable feature is manageability."
"The interface is very good, and quite user-friendly."
"The stability is rock solid."
"In terms of server provisioning, it only takes a few clicks of a button and a bit of install automation."
"What I like the most is the failover and the quick restore of virtual machines."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"Oracle is probably the best database technology out there. I've never found anything as complete in terms of feature and functionality and sophistication."
"The virtualization product Oracle puts out just complements the performance of the database."
"It's a very flexible solution because you have all the commands that you can do yourself."
"I rate Oracle VM's scalability a ten out of ten."
"In terms of improvement, I think that they could have more partnerships with providers."
"There are times when consultants, construction, or building firms need to use Beam but it can be difficult."
"There is no web interface for AHV."
"The solution could improve the call logging system to HPE, it is a bit tedious."
"I would like to see more automation of Day One operations, such as DRS, and HA."
"The licensing costs are a little bit expensive."
"In the next release of this solution, I would like to see support for containerization."
"The solution should work to improve its stability."
"Oracle VM needs to add a backup feature."
"The performance could be better because I need to purchase a lot of CPUs to perform in the workbench."
"I would say third-party plugins to other storage vendors. There are a lot of converged infrastructure setups; one that we have, multiple different hardware vendors. So that would be something we could definitely be looking for."
"It doesn't monitor everything, which is a little bit more difficult. It doesn't seem to have as many features or metrics to monitor as some others do, so you have to make some homemade scripts to do it."
"Its database management features could be better."
"There are currently issues with centralized storage."
"The solution is an outdated Xen-based application."
"The solution needs more features and flexibility in terms of communicating with other platforms. If it had that, it would be the perfect product."
Nutanix AHV Virtualization is ranked 5th in Server Virtualization Software with 48 reviews while Oracle VM is ranked 7th in Server Virtualization Software with 78 reviews. Nutanix AHV Virtualization is rated 8.6, while Oracle VM is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Nutanix AHV Virtualization writes "Lightweight, integrates well, and the technical support is responsive". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle VM writes "A cheap option available for Linux environments which is useful for many workloads". Nutanix AHV Virtualization is most compared with Proxmox VE, Hyper-V, VMware vSphere, KVM and XCP-ng virtualization platform, whereas Oracle VM is most compared with VMware vSphere, KVM, Oracle VM VirtualBox, Proxmox VE and Citrix Hypervisor. See our Nutanix AHV Virtualization vs. Oracle VM report.
See our list of best Server Virtualization Software vendors.
We monitor all Server Virtualization Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
