We compared OnSolve Platform for Critical Event Management and PagerDuty based on our users' reviews in five categories. We reviewed all of the data and you can find the conclusion below.
Features: The OnSolve Platform for Critical Event Management stands out for its mass notification capabilities, seamless integration with different communication channels, and the ability to monitor events in real time. PagerDuty’s stand-out features include urgency categorization, SMS paging, and a handy mobile application. Users also praised the solution’s comprehensive reporting and seamless integration. OnSolve Platform users requested better integration and reporting features. PagerDuty could enhance its functionality by leveraging webhooks and improving compatibility with common tools. Users also said the solution should enhance its Terraform integration and automate IT roster importing.
Service and Support: OnSolve Platform users found the support teams to be knowledgeable, helpful, and responsive. PagerDuty users say the solution’s customer service is excellent. They provide quick support and even offer video calls.
Ease of Deployment: Users said OnSolve Platform is easy to deploy thanks to the solution’s clear documentation and OnSolve’s helpful support. PagerDuty's setup is described as straightforward and easy, but users without experience may struggle with it.
Pricing: The cost of OnSolve Platform varies depending on the customer’s size and support license. To obtain specific information, it is recommended to visit the product's website or reach out to the sales team. PagerDuty offers competitive pricing with options for monthly or yearly licenses.
ROI: The potential return on investment for the OnSolve Platform for Critical Event Management and Blackberry AtHoc may vary. Refer to user feedback and real-life examples to gain a complete understanding of their potential ROI. Users appreciate the cost savings and enhanced efficiency that PagerDuty brings to their operations.
"The placeholder dropdowns for message templates are useful."
"It allows for a systematic and uniform method of alerting personnel in every location."
"The product easily integrates with other solutions."
"The SMS pages and the mobile application are pretty much the top two features."
"The solution's most valuable features are that it adds each alert as a service, has good scheduling capabilities, and includes the ability to write logic based on texts."
"The most valuable feature is definitely the flexibility of the schedule. The mobile app is quite also good for what we do: for receiving alerts, acknowledging, assigning, adding new responders. It has rich features for our needs."
"The product has valuable on-call scheduling, escalation, and incident workflow management features."
"The initial setup is a simple process."
"It has scaled well for us."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"Conference calling requires a complicated syntax formula."
"The user interface is too complicated and aspects that should be offered, such as email subject line editing, are not."
"It’s quite hard to reach the support team."
"The user interface could be more intuitive."
"The solution's analytics are okay. I don't think the features, at this point, give you a lot of insights. We have actually been trying to get insights from it but it hasn't really given us a lot of extra points to explore. We were looking at the number of alerts to see where many of the alerts were coming from. We never managed to get many insights on this."
"PagerDuty should be integrated with other tools, so it can import the IT roster automatically. Our other rules continue to work once they're configured, but the roster must be added manually."
"It cannot be integrated with our upgraded Jira system."
"Something that needs to be improved, is adding multilingual support."
"There is room for improvement with the time schedule. The way the schedule currently works is you assign all the team members in one schedule and it automatically spreads them around throughout the schedule... It would be better to be able to edit the schedule and place my team members where I want, or at least to have that option in addition to the automatic process."
"It is a very non-customizable product, so you cannot add things like root cause analysis or the classification of incidents based on the area where you are getting more incidents. For example, if you're getting a lot of database issues, that may be an are you want to probe."
Earn 20 points
OnSolve Platform for Critical Event Management is ranked 12th in IT Alerting and Incident Management while PagerDuty Operations Cloud is ranked 1st in IT Alerting and Incident Management with 35 reviews. OnSolve Platform for Critical Event Management is rated 6.0, while PagerDuty Operations Cloud is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of OnSolve Platform for Critical Event Management writes "Allows for a systematic and uniform method of alerting personnel in every location, but the user interface is too complicated". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PagerDuty Operations Cloud writes "Effectively generates alerts for incidents, making it suitable for 24/7 monitoring of infrastructure". OnSolve Platform for Critical Event Management is most compared with Everbridge Mass Notification, Everbridge IT Alerting, AlertMedia, Rave Alert and xMatters , whereas PagerDuty Operations Cloud is most compared with Opsgenie, ServiceNow, JIRA Service Management, Splunk On-Call and Zabbix.
See our list of best IT Alerting and Incident Management vendors and best Critical Event Management (CEM) vendors.
We monitor all IT Alerting and Incident Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.