We compared Ubuntu Linux and openSUSE Leap based on our user's reviews in several parameters.
Ubuntu Linux and openSUSE Leap both receive positive user feedback, with Ubuntu praised for its user-friendly interface, extensive software repositories, and security features, while openSUSE Leap is commended for its stability, reliability, and strong community support. Differences lie in Ubuntu's affordability and ease of customization, compared to openSUSE Leap's advanced features like the Btrfs file system and Snapper tool. Users suggest Ubuntu improves performance, system optimization, user interface, and compatibility, while openSUSE Leap could enhance package management, interface, stability, boot times, hardware compatibility, and documentation.
Features: Ubuntu Linux is acclaimed for its user-friendly interface, extensive software repositories, regular updates, and excellent community support. In contrast, openSUSE Leap stands out for its stability, reliability, YaST package manager for easy software installation, and advanced features like the Btrfs file system and Snapper tool for system snapshots.
Pricing and ROI: In terms of setup cost, Ubuntu Linux and openSUSE Leap both offer reasonable pricing structures. Users have found the setup process for Ubuntu Linux to be user-friendly and straightforward. The licensing for both products is flexible and accommodating for various usage requirements., Ubuntu Linux has a positive return on investment due to its affordability, compatibility with software and hardware, and improved efficiency. openSUSE Leap offers stability, ease of use, and cost-effectiveness, with comprehensive documentation and efficient troubleshooting support.
Room for Improvement: Ubuntu Linux could improve performance, system optimization, user interface, compatibility with hardware and software, and regular updates. On the other hand, openSUSE Leap could enhance package management, user interface, stability, boot times, hardware compatibility, and documentation.
Deployment and customer support: The user reviews for Ubuntu Linux and openSUSE Leap indicate that the time required for establishing a new tech solution varies significantly. Some users mentioned spending three months on deployment and an additional week on setup, while others only required a week for both deployment and setup., Users have expressed satisfaction with the customer service and support provided by Ubuntu Linux, commending the team for their prompt, reliable, and professional assistance. On the other hand, openSUSE Leap customers appreciate the team's responsiveness, helpfulness, and efficient assistance in resolving issues.
The summary above is based on 28 interviews we conducted recently with Ubuntu Linux and openSUSE Leap users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"Stable - it just runs without the necessity to reboot."
"openSUSE Leap has helped me with using containers in Podman."
"The solution is very stable after it is configured. It is hard to have a panel slow, a problem, misconfiguration, or any kind of loss function."
"I use openSUSE Leap as the base for the Kubernetes cluster we run in-house."
"The most valuable feature by far has been the virtualization capabilities of the operating system."
"The solution is easy for me to use because the backend is derived from FreeBSD and this is something I have been using for over 20 years."
"Doesn't require significant manual configuration."
"Use of the tools for systems and software to test functionalities."
"The most valuable features of Ubuntu Linux are it is user-friendly, has plenty of features that you can develop and builds your own code. Additionally, it is secure and easy to operate."
"I use Ubuntu Linux to update some drivers related to some of my work."
"We can easily customize the NTS Client code."
"The feature that I have found the most valuable is that it is open source. It is also very easy to manage. We can manage it ourselves."
"I like the flexibility."
"The setup is fairly easy."
"Like most Linux-based operating systems, the biggest challenge Leap faces is the GUI."
"There is room for improvement in the console."
"In the future, the Active Directory could improve."
"Somehow the change from OS12.x via 13.x to Leap was a bit bumpy and some old issues seemed to reappear."
"The initial system setup or network configuration of the solution is not straightforward and can be improved."
"I would like openSUSE Leap to have better link integration with Windows."
"The solution is not user-friendly in comparison with Windows."
"Limited application support compared with Windows and MacOS."
"It could always be a bit more secure."
"The product could be compatible with Microsoft."
"Ubuntu is putting great efforts into making their platform a great hosting platform for Kubernetes and other related tools, but they are not addressing the challenges with what it takes to run Ubuntu in a large Windows-based environment."
"The encryption of the partition regarding software systems could be improved."
"Sometimes certain tasks are challenging due to issues with the command-line interface. Users who prefer Windows may find it difficult to transition to Linux."
"The installation of Ubuntu is somewhat complicated, requires better documentation."
openSUSE Leap is ranked 12th in Operating Systems (OS) for Business with 6 reviews while Ubuntu Linux is ranked 2nd in Operating Systems (OS) for Business with 133 reviews. openSUSE Leap is rated 9.0, while Ubuntu Linux is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of openSUSE Leap writes "Good virtualization capabilities, stable, and cost-effective ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ubuntu Linux writes "A stable and free solution that is easy to deploy and has a user-friendly GUI". openSUSE Leap is most compared with SUSE Linux Enterprise, Rocky Linux, CentOS, Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) and Oracle Linux, whereas Ubuntu Linux is most compared with Rocky Linux, Oracle Linux, SUSE Linux Enterprise, Windows Server and Oracle Solaris. See our Ubuntu Linux vs. openSUSE Leap report.
See our list of best Operating Systems (OS) for Business vendors.
We monitor all Operating Systems (OS) for Business reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.