We performed a comparison between Oracle Database In-Memory and Progress OpenEdge RDBMS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Embedded Database solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The application development is very user-friendly."
"The scalability of the solution is very good. It's able to support large amounts of data."
"It accelerates query processing, which in turn speeds up operations and streamlines workflow, and ultimately enhancing productivity."
"The on-premise version is stable. We have different teams and resources for the server side, for admin, and for development. We can easily take care of all the services and applications."
"The product offers high scalability."
"The scalability is very good."
"The solution is very fast."
"It efficiently handles low-code data and supports read-and-write operations for clustering."
"The product can be scaled in any direction and a very nice feature is that you can logically split the database by the value of the data, which is great."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The query optimization and backup features should be added."
"The pricing could be improved. It would ideal if it was more reasonable."
"We use some partitions in In-Memory. We have a very large table and a low dose. It is very expensive in data to load all of them into In-Memory. It takes up more memory slots in the server, as well as a lot of RAM. We use last partitions on the table. We always need to create a script and make a schedule that can load a last partition in In-Memory. Oracle doesn't have features to do this automatically. I would like them to allow us to load last partitions, as well as other table partitions, in In-Memory. I think a good feature would do that automatically, letting you see a table, load a large partition, and monitor loading memory. It's quite a good feature."
"The solution is quite expensive."
"The high cost of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"Oracle should include column store or advanced query optimization so a database can be optimized by enabling analytic queries to run faster."
"Lacks sufficient integration with other tools."
"They should improve the solution's scalability for large databases."
"Advanced security would be a good additional feature."
"The only big hurdle for us is that most customers aren't familiar with it, so it's scary. If you're in commercial environments, everybody knows SQL, everybody knows Oracle, or whatever."
Earn 20 points
Oracle Database In-Memory is ranked 2nd in Embedded Database with 27 reviews while Progress OpenEdge RDBMS is ranked 5th in Embedded Database. Oracle Database In-Memory is rated 8.8, while Progress OpenEdge RDBMS is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Oracle Database In-Memory writes "User friendly with great scalability but needs to move toward intelligent AI". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Progress OpenEdge RDBMS writes "Customizable, intelligent, and reacts in real-time". Oracle Database In-Memory is most compared with SAP HANA, IBM Db2 Database, SQL Server, MariaDB and Apache Derby, whereas Progress OpenEdge RDBMS is most compared with SAP HANA. See our Oracle Database In-Memory vs. Progress OpenEdge RDBMS report.
See our list of best Embedded Database vendors.
We monitor all Embedded Database reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.