We performed a comparison between Palo Alto Networks VM-Series and Palo Alto Networks WildFire based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It offers a single pane of glass for all the different types of installations."
"It provides complete security posture from end-to-end. This has given us better visibility into what our security aspects are."
"We now know a lot more detail about what our users are doing on the network."
"It gives us the ease that we are secure. We have set up the proper things that help make our data safe."
"It scales linearly with load and no issues."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is the zero-trust security architecture."
"We have reduced the number of configuration lines by 90%. We need fewer number of admins right now because of it."
"It is nice to have a rock solid security platform that we can count on."
"Intuitive threat prevention and analysis solution, with a machine learning feature. Scalable, stable, and protects against zero-day threats."
"WildFire has been instrumental in blocking a number of new threats, before common desktop anti-virus tools were able to detect them."
"We get support in the free version."
"Whole team can use the firewall and understand it."
"The cloud-based services are a nice feature."
"The reporting feature helps our performance."
"The most valuable feature is the improved security that it offers."
"WildFire's application encryption is useful."
"All areas need improvement: manufacturing, education, financial, etc."
"Palo Alto is that it is really bad when it comes to technical support."
"The disadvantage with Palo Alto is that they don't have a cloud-based solution that includes a secure web gateway."
"The interface is all Java-based. I would prefer an HTML5 interface."
"They made only a halfhearted attempt to put in DLP (Data Loss Prevention)."
"It can definitely improve on the performance."
"The utilization monitoring and GUI have room for improvement."
"There is no proper support channel to follow up on cases."
"The only complaint that we receive from our customers is in regards to the price."
"Management and web filtering can be improved. There should also be better reporting, particularly around web filtering."
"The cost of this solution could still be improved, in particular, giving product discounts for charitable causes."
"Our main concern is that everything has to be synced with the WildFire Cloud and has to be checked through the subscription."
"The price of WildFire should be reduced in order to make it more affordable for our customers."
"The free version does not have real-time updates. It is slow."
"The product's false positive logs could be more user-friendly to understand. They could provide examples of precious cases to learn."
"In the future, Palo Alto could reduce the time it takes to process the file."
Palo Alto Networks VM-Series is ranked 11th in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) with 53 reviews while Palo Alto Networks WildFire is ranked 3rd in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) with 58 reviews. Palo Alto Networks VM-Series is rated 8.6, while Palo Alto Networks WildFire is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks VM-Series writes "Many features are optimized for troubleshooting real-time scenarios, saving a lot of time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks WildFire writes "Good technical support and provides automatic analysis that saves us time in filtering email". Palo Alto Networks VM-Series is most compared with Azure Firewall, Fortinet FortiGate-VM, Fortinet FortiGate, Cisco Secure Firewall and Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls, whereas Palo Alto Networks WildFire is most compared with Cisco Secure Firewall, Fortinet FortiGate, Juniper SRX Series Firewall, Proofpoint Email Protection and Fortinet FortiSandbox. See our Palo Alto Networks VM-Series vs. Palo Alto Networks WildFire report.
See our list of best Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) vendors.
We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.