We performed a comparison between PeopleStrong and SAP HCM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud HCM solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The UI and UX are fantastic."
"PeopleStrong Alt is flexible because it allows customization and the user's experience is very good."
"It has the capability of reporting. We, as a business team, found it good. In fact, we migrated to PeopleStrong essentially because of its reporting feature."
"The product has valuable flexibility for customization, user interface, and search capabilities."
"The mobile responsiveness is strong."
"The hiring process is good. It will create a process-oriented procedure in terms of hiring, promotion, the movement of people, and other related HR tasks."
"Some of the most valuable features are the onboarding experience of new employees, the employee service portal, and the entire performance management system."
"It is a pretty stable solution."
"SAP HCM has valuable features for analytics data management."
"The platform is simple to use and has a user-friendly dashboard and integration features."
"The technical support is quite good."
"We have features such as ABKRS based on the client's requirement, tariff and TMSTA, and so on."
"The payroll and time management features are useful."
"It is a scalable solution. There are three administrators maintaining the solution: an HR person, a payroll person, and one backup."
"It simplifies everything for human capital management, and all users can do self-enrollment for leaves and those kinds of things. The employee self-service feature is quite a powerful feature for me. You can install it on your mobile phone or iPad and do your employee service activity there."
"Sometimes, we feel that we should have an API-based integration aspect."
"They could improve talent management capabilities."
"It would be helpful if you could work offline because sometimes, we have problems with internet connectivity."
"They had challenges getting the performance management system up and integrated with our systems."
"The solution's workflow can improve by adding more customization at the organizational level."
"They could include a sort of collaborative platform where employees are able to work together with a chat mechanism like WhatsApp and video chat."
"The global scalability and support could improve."
"The breadth of functionality offered by SAP HCM comes at a cost."
"SAP HCM has many different channels for communication with the consultants which makes it complex. There are delays when there is a problem."
"It would be very helpful for our company if a new version was released with the ability to contain all of the things that we have newly introduced in our company."
"The speed of technical support can be improved."
"Reports need to be added on the time management side."
"The solution is rather expensive."
"SAP now does the most innovation for the cloud solution and less innovation for the on-premises client."
"It needs a lot of end user training as it is not intuitive at all."
PeopleStrong is ranked 13th in Cloud HCM with 7 reviews while SAP HCM is ranked 3rd in Cloud HCM with 48 reviews. PeopleStrong is rated 7.6, while SAP HCM is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of PeopleStrong writes "Simple, easy to access and interface is quite user-friendly. ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP HCM writes "Allows you to generate reports, easy integration and offers out-of-the-box support". PeopleStrong is most compared with PeopleSoft, SAP SuccessFactors, DarwinBox, ZingHR and Oracle HCM Cloud, whereas SAP HCM is most compared with SAP SuccessFactors, Workday, Oracle HCM Cloud, ADP GlobalView Payroll and Oracle Payroll. See our PeopleStrong vs. SAP HCM report.
See our list of best Cloud HCM vendors and best Talent Management vendors.
We monitor all Cloud HCM reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.