We performed a comparison between Proofpoint Threat Response and ServiceNow Security Operations based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Security Incident Response solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The best part of Proofpoint Threat Response is the Auto-Pull feature. Being able to pull an email back from a user's mailbox is very useful, yet I have noticed that not a lot of organizations use this kind of feature."
"It has reduced our manual efforts to remove emails from each user's inbox, and in this case we do not have to ask our IT department or users to do so."
"Support is very responsive."
"It gives you the ability to bring data into the system. The workflows are out of the box, and it gives you the ability to auto-assign the incidents based on criteria and vulnerabilities."
"ServiceNow Security Operations also takes care of GRC, governance, risk and compliance, enabling it to provide risk assessment."
"Reduces time to closure and closure metrics for vulnerabilities."
"It has helped optimize security costs by consolidating multiple tools into one platform."
"The solution is stable."
"The ease of use is great."
"The solution is available over the cloud and is easy to manage."
"The "follow" feature is really good. If the user is not responding, there's an option to "follow". Just click on the button, and it will automatically trigger an email to the end user."
"The interface within Threat Response could be made simpler."
"If the reporting gets improved then it would be better, but the product is running amazing as it is."
"Has some quirks."
"An area for improvement I observed in ServiceNow Security Operations is the need to maintain correct CMDB data because if you're unable to do this, you can't perfectly maintain the vulnerability data. CMDB data in ServiceNow Security Operations needs to be accurate. As I've been working on ServiceNow Security Operations for only seven months, I still need more time to try all its modules before I can give recommendations regarding additional features I'd like to see in the solution."
"In future releases, I would like to add a follow-up and reminder feature. For the tickets in our queue, we could set reminders. This would help us prioritize older tickets before moving on to new ones."
"It's very slow. When you click a button or update a field, it takes forever to actually react."
"It is challenging for the customers to understand the processes for SecOps. It needs to be simplified."
"Process framework and best practices for ease of integration between IT and security teams via incident, problem, and change."
"The initial setup is difficult."
"We'd like customization to be easier in terms of the UI and using the dashboards."
"The threat intelligence module needs a better dashboard."
More ServiceNow Security Operations Pricing and Cost Advice →
Proofpoint Threat Response is ranked 5th in Security Incident Response with 3 reviews while ServiceNow Security Operations is ranked 2nd in Security Incident Response with 15 reviews. Proofpoint Threat Response is rated 8.4, while ServiceNow Security Operations is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Proofpoint Threat Response writes "Tracks and mitigates email security incidents with Auto-Pull, and has good stability and performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ServiceNow Security Operations writes "Mature with nice UI and customizable workflows". Proofpoint Threat Response is most compared with Cofense Triage and Splunk Attack Analyzer, whereas ServiceNow Security Operations is most compared with Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR, Microsoft Sentinel and IBM Resilient. See our Proofpoint Threat Response vs. ServiceNow Security Operations report.
See our list of best Security Incident Response vendors.
We monitor all Security Incident Response reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.