We performed a comparison between Qualys VMDR and Trend Micro Cloud One based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: Qualys VMDR is praised for its user-friendly interface, prioritization system, and customizable dashboard. It effectively addresses vulnerabilities and offers valuable scanning capabilities. Trend Micro Cloud One users value its extensive range of features, strong vulnerability protection, and real-time server security. Reviewers said Qualys VMDR could improve by offering more customization options and integrating more seamlessly with other systems. The interface could be clearer, and Qualys could enhance scanning capabilities for IoT and industrial control systems. Trend Micro Cloud One should provide equal support for AWS and Azure and enhance its automation capabilities.
Service and Support: Qualys VMDR's customer service is mostly considered accessible and responsive. However, some reviewers reported slow response times and expressed a desire for more skilled support personnel. Trend Micro Cloud One was commended for its exceptional and easily accessible technical support. Users value the expertise and knowledge of the Trend Micro team.
Ease of Deployment: Qualys VMDR's setup is considered uncomplicated and efficient, requiring only a short amount of time. A few users encountered challenges with integration and ensuring data privacy. Some found Trend Micro Cloud One easy to set up, while others found it complicated. It could pose challenges for individuals without a background in IT or information security. The deployment time varied depending on the complexity of the system.
Pricing: The cost of Qualys VMDR varies depending on the organization's business requirements. Some find it affordable, but others consider it costly compared to alternatives. The view of Trend Micro Cloud One's pricing is generally positive, though some noted that customers must pay extra for additional services.
ROI: Qualys VMDR is highly efficient in identifying vulnerabilities and reducing risks. Trend Micro Cloud One offers a solid return on investment and smooth integration without any reported issues.
Comparison Results: Qualys VMDR is preferred over Trend Micro Cloud One. Qualys VMDR is lauded for its intuitive and easy-to-use interface, distinguishing it from other similar tools. Users find the setup process of Qualys VMDR straightforward and easy, while reviews of Trend Micro Cloud One's setup process have been mixed. While Trend Micro Cloud One is commended for its comprehensive feature set, users think it needs improvements in pricing, automation, and ease of setup.
"PingSafe offers comprehensive security posture management."
"The most valuable features of PingSafe are the asset inventory and issue indexing."
"The solution is a good alerting tool."
"We noted immediate benefits from using the solution."
"PingSafe has a dashboard that can detect the criticality of a particular problem, whether it falls under critical, medium, or low vulnerability."
"Cloud Native Security is user-friendly. Everything in the Cloud Native Security tool is straightforward, including detections, integration, reporting, etc. They are constantly improving their UI by adding plugins and other features."
"When creating cloud infrastructure, Cloud Native Security evaluates the cloud security parameters and how they will impact the organization's risk. It lets us know whether our security parameter conforms to international industry standards. It alerts us about anything that increases our risk, so we can address those vulnerabilities and prevent attacks."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its storyline, which helps trace an event back to its source, like an email or someone clicking on a link."
"Monitors workstations and servers for vulnerabilities and creates reports."
"What I like about Qualys VM is the dashboard presentation. It's very good."
"The most valuable feature is the certificate management."
"Qualys VM has allowed us to know the vulnerabilities we need to prioritize based on the threat levels and the possible impact if there's an intrusion."
"It is a stable solution."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is the external channel."
"Great web application security for scanning."
"I like that we have many scanners and channels that don't overload. It helps us scan and track easily. Also, the tagging system is good for tagging. We can still use QualysAgent task ID tools even if tags aren't made."
"Detection response and cloud conformity are valuable features."
"The storage and computing features are valuable."
"Virtual patching is one of the key features, which is executed with their IPS."
"The security is good."
"The tech support is excellent. They really know their products. They also know a lot of about the integrations between different solutions."
"It has the best EDR functionality for cloud and typical endpoints."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security's best features are security analysis, remote access security, and driver security."
"The perfect package for all security platforms, providing more than any other endpoint solution."
"PingSafe can be improved by developing a comprehensive set of features that allow for automated workflows."
"After closing an alert in Cloud Native Security, it still shows as unresolved."
"Bugs need to be disclosed quickly."
"PingSafe takes four to five hours to detect and highlight an issue, and that time should be reduced."
"It took us a while to configure the software to work well in this type of environment, as the support documents were not always clear."
"For vulnerabilities, they are showing CVE ID. The naming convention should be better so that it indicates the container where a vulnerability is present. Currently, they are only showing CVE ID, but the same CVE ID might be present in multiple containers. We would like to have the container name so that we can easily fix the issue."
"The cost has the potential for improvement."
"There's room for improvement in the graphic explorer."
"The ability to manage user accounts and give rights to the operator to know about abnormalities of applications is something that needs improvement."
"The only improvement I can think of is on the implementation side. At times it is a bit slow."
"The customer support is very bad."
"Its integration with ServiceNow and other similar products is complicated and can be improved. It should also have virtual batching. They should support more standards and compliance requirements and more customizations. For policy compliance, they can add the standards required by the countries in the Middle East. Each country generates its own standards and frameworks, and those frameworks should be there in all products, not only in Qualys. The market here is huge, especially in the cybersecurity field. Qatar has a framework for Qatar 2022, and each and every company in the public or private sector has to follow the Qatar 2022 framework."
"Integration could be better. When you think about scanning, it's not used just with this product alone but with other Qualys products. If you think about the bundle, the product itself is good. But integration with other products and packages has space for improvement. They should also offer a better price for bundles."
"Qualys VMDR is basically susceptible to false positives, and false negatives."
"They have integrated with other third parties, but it is still not viable."
"Qualys should improve their customer experience. They need to improve the tech support experience and the turnaround time."
"The workbook insights generate a massive list, making it inconvenient to review."
"The dashboard should be a bit more intuitive."
"There are also some loopholes because it's a new product that they have recently migrated to the cloud. We do see some issues with the policies we have assigned when it comes to a particular account. There are some issues with system support, such as a particular server kernel version that is not supported."
"The initial setup is easy for someone who operates container platforms on a daily basis. However, it could be difficult for those coming purely from informational security or another field of an IT."
"One area for improvement in Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is marketing; in particular, Trend Vision should update the marketing documentation. The information needs to be more comprehensive."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security could improve connections with different types of authentication and user groups concerning cloud services."
"The local agent should be able to show more logs. At present, the logs are only available from the web console and not from the local agent."
"Documentation on cloud architecture and job architecture would be helpful."
More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Trend Vision One - Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Qualys VMDR is ranked 11th in Container Security with 77 reviews while Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is ranked 8th in Container Security with 17 reviews. Qualys VMDR is rated 8.2, while Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Qualys VMDR writes "Good visibility but expensive and needs better support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Vision One - Cloud Security writes "We can quickly deploy cloud conformity, provides good visibility, and control". Qualys VMDR is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Tenable Security Center, Rapid7 InsightVM, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Tenable Vulnerability Management, whereas Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Cloud, AWS GuardDuty, Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks and CrowdStrike Falcon. See our Qualys VMDR vs. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security report.
See our list of best Container Security vendors.
We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
