We performed a comparison between SecurityScorecard and Tenable Vulnerability Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, OneTrust, BitSight and others in IT Vendor Risk Management."I rate the product's initial setup phase a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is a difficult setup phase, and ten is an easy setup process."
"With its automated approach, nothing is missed on the IPs your organization is related to."
"The solution helps identify our environment's vulnerabilities."
"One of its most effective features for risk identification is its enterprise-ready automation for third-party risk measurements."
"The initial setup is pretty straightforward."
"The vulnerability scanning is the most important aspect of the solution for us."
"The ease of use in terms of scanning assets is valuable."
"The solution is easy to use and configuration is smooth with no complexities."
"The integration of Tenable into our security ecosystem was very good."
"The vulnerability management itself is the most valuable feature as well as references to the mitigation techniques."
"Tenable.io Vulnerability Management is an easy-to-use product. I"
"Technical support has been good. They respond quite quickly."
"SecurityScorecard's technical team's response time is an area that my company expects to be made faster."
"There could be more information in regards to solving problems like hints on what specifically to look for."
"They could improve the process with a questionnaire module for the product."
"The tool needs to have the ability to mitigate vulnerabilities with alternative solutions."
"It can have more integration."
"The reporting was never great in Tenable Vulnerability Management, so, in my company, we imported all the data into Ivanti RiskSense to start using it for reporting."
"I would like the solution to cover the whole cycle of mitigation since it's an area where the solution currently lacks."
"The stability has room for improvement."
"More flexibility is required compared to other solutions."
"Tenable could improve visibility into assets, including automated asset tagging. You should be able to automatically tag assets based on location, function, ownership, etc. That would help us because we spend a lot of time identifying and tagging assets by hand."
"I'd like to see them improve their support."
"They need to have more dependable and faster support."
More Tenable Vulnerability Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
SecurityScorecard is ranked 5th in IT Vendor Risk Management with 4 reviews while Tenable Vulnerability Management is ranked 2nd in Vulnerability Management with 39 reviews. SecurityScorecard is rated 8.0, while Tenable Vulnerability Management is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of SecurityScorecard writes "Easy-to-deploy product with good technical support services ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Vulnerability Management writes "Discovers vulnerabilities and integrates well with other solutions". SecurityScorecard is most compared with Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management, Recorded Future, RiskRecon, Tenable Nessus and Rapid7 InsightVM, whereas Tenable Vulnerability Management is most compared with Tenable Security Center, Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Amazon Inspector and Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management.
We monitor all IT Vendor Risk Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.